http://www.telusplanet.net/public/dmanders/index.html from caneman@clnk.com Fri Mar 10 10:55:20 2000 (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-61365U2500L250S0V35)with SMTP id com; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 10:52:08 -0600 "Rod Makers List Serve" Subject: Re: Ferrule Material Darrell,Before you read this, understand that I am not trying to beat you todeath with numbers, but being an engineer by nature, I look at things frommechanical advantage/disadvantage points when I hear of a new idea orinnovation... so don't take this wrong, but I did a little tinkering aroundlast nite in the shop just to see what making the kind of tip over buttjoint you suggest would involve. Now, read it with a smile, and don't takeanything as a flame here, it is just my point of view backed by a littlemeasuring, weighing and calculating.I understand your point about wanting to see if something can be donethat hasn't, and to a certain extent, I understand wanting to try thingsnew, and that many of traditionalist (and I guess I am one to a certainextent) don't want to hear about anything new being tried. My point is,that ferrules are cheap, and making a ferrule on a lathe is more cost/timeeffective than trying to make a tapered fit bamboo "joint" on a rod. Yourpoint did get me curious, and I tried to set down and do a little numbercrunching, and I think if you will do the same, you can see that the castingcharacteristics of a rod with a tapered bamboo joint/ferrule would bemuchmore affected than you think it would. The taper would have to bedrastically altered, especially in the first 10 inches aft of the joint. Ithink your wieght concerns over the nickel silver ferrules would beinsignificant. The amount of cane that would have to be added wouldweighmore than a set of ferrules with walls 0.0175" thick (typical of a Super Ztype ferrule). Considering the stress, shear and strain values of bamboocompared to that of 18% nickel silver, the bamboo would have to be about8.5times as thick to have the same effective strength as the Nickel silverferrules... that would make a typical joint have to be almost .30" largerthan a traditional NS ferrule joint, plus, since you have to taper up tothis joint, then, even if you do it very rapidly, lets say you have a 2.5"area over which the "swell" is developed then allow an inch for thetaperedfit on the butt end of it, then you have added a piece of bamboo thatweighs6.4 grams... an 11/64ths Super Z type ferrule weighs 5.0 grams (notguessingat these, weighed on my triple beam scales, both ferrules and bamboo...andI did take a piece of scrap end cut from a blank, basically straight sandedon my belt sander, from a 1/2d inch section down to a .250d over the areawhere the swell would have to put when planed or milled in, drilled theendof the scrap with a 1/8" bit and used a violin peg reamer to ream out atapered hole in the end for a butt section to go into... didn't take long, Ihave plenty of scrap! LOL) so you are, actually not removing weight bygetting rid of the NS ferrule, but adding weight. Note that the actualdimensions of my little test piece is about .050" smaller than what wouldberequired to have the same strength as a NS ferrule, so the weight wouldprobably be an couple of tenths of a gram more. This much differencewoulddefinitely require more "meat" in the butt section which adds more weighttothe overall rod. Pretty much, it would be like putting the weight of a17/64ths superZ ferrule on a 4 weight rod. That is a lot of difference.And again, I must reiterate aesthetics. You have a rod with a tip sectionthat would be, normally, relatively small at it's thickest point, lets say.162 on my 6' 2wt, at its largest point, that now has a swell in it that, inorder to be strong and reliable, that would now have to be swelled up to.462... That is a half inch lump in the middle of an otherwise steamlineddelicate rod... that normally weighs 48.5 grams (just finished one so itwasconvenient to weigh the 2 wt) or 1.7 ounces, that now has at least 1.4gramsmore at the ferrule location(the bamboo of the butt has to fill the taperedhole, so that would add another 2 grams to the joint) and (just estimatinghere) probably another 4 grams added overall in the butt section to add thematerial necessary to make up for the heavier ferrule, adding a total of atleast 5.4 grams to the overall weight of the rod, making it over .2 ouncesheavier than a NS ferruled rod.As far as the power fiber issue, I do have to disagree on that. I havebuilt over 200 rods to day, and restored God knows how many. I tried thisconcept of removing outer material from a rod to change its castingcharacteristics on older 9 footers in making them into 6 footers for otherpeople, and my experience is that the rods cast like shit when you starttaking off very much of the outer layers. The inner layer of cane is pithand has no grain... that is all the power fibers are is the grain of thegrass, and without those, the grass (cane) loses a lot of thecharacteristics that make it what it is...You have done a lot of things and posted them on this list that are veryinteresting, very good, very innovative, and I appreciate that, but I failto see where there would be any advantage to an innovation that wouldmake arod bulkier and heavier for the sake of saving the cost of a set offerrules.One final note, if you are going try this, I would like to suggest thatyou contact a Luthiers supply house and get a violin peg shave (like a veryaccurate pencil sharpener) and a tapered reamer built for violin pegs. Thiswould give you as perfect a fit as possible on your tapered joint. I have aset, and if I remember right, they only cost about 30 each and I thinkInternational Violin Supply (you can find them somewhere on the net)carriesthem. OK, Now I have a brain cramp and need more coffee! *S* Later,Bob -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: Ferrule Material I think you have the wrong idea about my experimentsin rod building. It isn't to make a rod to sell for$1000.00. Mostly it is to see if it can be done.People making cane rods are so tradition bound, andeveryone is so afraid to do something different becauseit might not be accepted by other cane rod people thatnothing innovative ever gets tried. Swelling the butt end of a tip section can't bedone over short enoughof a physical area to NOT have a noticable effect thestress curve and theway the rod casts. Even if this does have a noticeable effect on the stresscurve, well then, adjust the taper to compensate! Well, now you have to turndown the tip end of the butt section to go inside it, so unless younearlydouble the dimension of the butt end of the tip, then you are going tohaveto turn the majority of the power fibers off of the end of the buttsectionto get it to fit inside the tip... As I have said before - "power fibers" at least whatmost people call "power fibers" (the layer of tinyfibers right under the enamel) are highly overrated.I have made rods where I planed away all the "powerfibers" and the rod casts fine. It is not a softnoodle, it does not break at the touch of a feather,it casts and fishes just fine. And no, the taper isn't massive to compensate for theadded weight. Remember we are getting rid of the weightof the metal ferrule, and even more bamboo for the swelled sectiondoesn'tweigh as much as the metal. Darryl from cattanac@wmis.net Fri Mar 10 11:11:05 2000 mail4.wmis.net (8.8.8/SCO5) with SMTP id Subject: Re: Taper alteration The problem that you will hit is forshortening a taper is that the naturalcompression pushes the shift dimensions off of the normal 5" centers - sosome 'fudging' is needed -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: Taper alteration Ernie,Is that length with the rod sections joined? Joining the sections iskindof standard when measuring.Shortening the taper by 11 inches is quite a bit. You're going from7'7"to 6'8" if I read you right. I would plug the orignal taper into Hexrodandshorten it with the computer. But be aware that any rod shortened nearlyafoot will be different than the original. Harry What is the correct way of shortening a 5 weight taper from 91 inchesto80inches and what effects would it have on the completed rod? The roddesignis given as a 7.5 foot rod but it's actual measured length is 91 inches. from Neil126@aol.com Fri Mar 10 11:20:27 2000 Subject: Planing Form Input I would be interested if anyone has hadexperience with the Munro "Hex" MasterSignature series of planing forms? As I do not want to cause a great discussionon this subject, private responces will workjust fine. Thank you in advance for your input. Neil Swanson from rsgould@cmc.net Fri Mar 10 12:19:38 2000 Subject: Re: is this good cane? Hi Gary,I think Harry's resonse was right on. Remember too, that culms are usuallystraightened somewhat before they are shipped to us and that it's possiblesome damage may have occurred in that process.Ray----- Original Message ----- Subject: is this good cane? folks, i was straightening a piece of newly split cane last night. while holdinganode over the heat gun, and applying my usual amount of (semi gentle)pressure, the piece broke off, about a quarter inch from the node. breakwas clean and straight, rather than having the brush- like effect offiberson each side. i've made two rods on the same heat gun setting, samemethods, &c., without having seen such a phenom before. any commentsonthequality of the culm? i seem to recall seeing a picture of a similar breakin a book somewhere, and reading that it indicated a poor culm, but idon'tremember where. tks, glm--------------------gary mischcdr, usn (ret.) from rsgould@cmc.net Fri Mar 10 12:26:06 2000 Subject: Re: Taper alteration Hi Ernie,If you would like to send me the existing taper of the rod in 5" incrementsalong with the line size you plan to use and an indication of whether or notthere is any broken or damaged pieces, I'd be glad to run a computeranalysis for you and give you a recommendation.Ray----- Original Message ----- Subject: Taper alteration What is the correct way of shortening a 5 weight taper from 91 inchesto80inches and what effects would it have on the completed rod? The roddesignis given as a 7.5 foot rod but it's actual measured length is 91 inches.Ernie Harrison from KlingB@health.missouri.edu Fri Mar 10 13:00:10 2000 Subject: RE: Humidity and Finishes Right. And if there was any doubt that rods adjust to ambient humidityregardless of finish, the recent posts on shrinking and growing ferrulesshould dispell them. If the bamboo inside a ferrule can change in watercontent, as they clearly do, the same must certainly happen in the rest ofthe rod. That being the case, I can't think of any reason the waterproofness of afinish would matter. BK -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: Humidity and Finishes As far as water vapor (ambient humidity) passage through a film of finishisconcerned, it is: 1) inevitable; 2) unable to distinguish between enteringor exiting; 3) constantly occuring over a rate of time that depends upontype of finish and thickness of film cheers, Bill-----------------------------------------------------Click here for Free Video!!http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/ ----- Original Message ----- mcdowellc@lanecc.edu> RODMAKERS@wugate.wustl.edu> Subject: Humidity and Finishes While we're on this subject I have a question for those that have read upon this subject in the woodworking magazines or elsewhere. Do thevarious finishes differ in terms of how much total moisture is ever allowed to re- enter the rod or do they really only differ in the rate of time ittakes Also, do the finishes that provide a slower rate of ambiant moistureentry, in turn, provide a slower rate of ambiant moisture exiting the rod? Thanks,Chrismcdowellc@lanecc.edu from ernie2@pacbell.net Fri Mar 10 13:10:54 2000 sims.3.5.1999.09.16.21.57.p8)with SMTP id for Subject: Re: Taper alteration I guess my confusion was caused by my misunderstanding of what pointsreallyare in a rod taper. I was reading them as inches, but it seems they mustbejust points along the rod length and can vary as far as actual length ininches is concerned. Example: a 90" rod that has 80 points in it's taperwould have a point value equal to 1.125" and a 90" rod with 90 points init's taper would have a point value of 1". Is this correct?Ernie Harrison from DNHayashida@aol.com Fri Mar 10 13:48:50 2000 Subject: Re: Ferrule Material Bob,You are Right! I am Wrong! WHAT ever was I thinking??!!This tip over butt ferrule is going in the trash can right now!!! Next time I think of something new I'll clear it withyou first! Thank you for setting me on the "Right Path". Darryl from brewer@teleport.com Fri Mar 10 14:03:53 2000 "hamachi"via SMTP by relay1.teleport.com, id smtpdAAAc9t_s_; Fri Mar 10 12:03:492000 Subject: Re: Planing Form Input I have one and am very satisfied. You should know that I have planed out 5rods so far, so I'm no expert. I had no problems with Jon. Everything wasasrepresented. -Randy Brewer ----- Original Message ----- Subject: Planing Form Input I would be interested if anyone has hadexperience with the Munro "Hex" MasterSignature series of planing forms? As I do not want to cause a great discussionon this subject, private responces will workjust fine. Thank you in advance for your input. Neil Swanson from fbcwin@3g.quik.com Fri Mar 10 14:06:31 2000 Fri, 10 Mar 2000 12:06:09 -0800 Subject: Re: Taper alteration Ernie,No, you had it right the first time, but I think I can help. Many of thepublished tapers seem to be 10" or so shorter than the actual rod length. Thelast 10 inches is usually not measured because it is under the grip and thereelseat. We usually assume that the measurements under the cork and reelseat arethe same as the largest measurement. To convert that 80 inchmeasurement into arod of 90 inches, just use the same measurement at 80", 85", and 90". Thatshould do the trick. 0 - .0705 - .078etc,75 - .31880 - .335One can fairly safely assume that the measurements at 85 and 90inches willalso be .335. Hope this helps,Harry Ernie Harrison wrote: I guess my confusion was caused by my misunderstanding of what pointsreallyare in a rod taper. I was reading them as inches, but it seems they mustbejust points along the rod length and can vary as far as actual length ininches is concerned. Example: a 90" rod that has 80 points in it's taperwould have a point value equal to 1.125" and a 90" rod with 90 points init's taper would have a point value of 1". Is this correct?Ernie Harrison --Harry Boydhttp://HarryBoydbamboorods.eboard.com/ from dannyt@frisurf.no Fri Mar 10 15:30:55 2000 (MET) Subject: Re: Taper alteration boundary="MS_Mac_OE_3035658476_23245_MIME_Part" This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does notunderstandthis format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --MS_Mac_OE_3035658476_23245_MIME_Part To all... Is the same happening if You lenghten it as well, I mean will it differentmuch from the original? regardsdanny------>--------work From: Harry Boyd Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2000 09:22:11 -0600 Cc: Rodmakers Subject: Re: Taper alteration Ernie,Is that length with the rod sections joined? Joining the sections is kindof standard when measuring.Shortening the taper by 11 inches is quite a bit. You're going from 7'7"to 6'8" if I read you right. I would plug the orignal taper into Hexrod andshorten it with the computer. But be aware that any rod shortenednearly afoot will be different than the original. Harry --MS_Mac_OE_3035658476_23245_MIME_Part Re: Taper alteration To all... Is the same happening if You lenghten it as well, I mean will it different =much from the original? regardsdanny Danny Twang section=s is kind into Hexrod and shortene=d nearly a --MS_Mac_OE_3035658476_23245_MIME_Part-- from nobler@satx.rr.com Fri Mar 10 17:19:32 2000 SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19);Fri, 10 Mar 2000 17:20:18 -0600 Subject: Re: Humidity and Finishes Now that I think of it, I have an unfinished extra tip to my PHY #11Parabolic, that split the male ferrule, just sitting in its case. It wouldstill fit the female though ! GMA----- Original Message ----- Subject: RE: Humidity and Finishes Right. And if there was any doubt that rods adjust to ambient humidityregardless of finish, the recent posts on shrinking and growing ferrulesshould dispell them. If the bamboo inside a ferrule can change in watercontent, as they clearly do, the same must certainly happen in the restofthe rod. That being the case, I can't think of any reason the waterproofness of afinish would matter. BK -----Original Message----- Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 7:58 AM Subject: Re: Humidity and Finishes As far as water vapor (ambient humidity) passage through a film offinishisconcerned, it is: 1) inevitable; 2) unable to distinguish between enteringor exiting; 3) constantly occuring over a rate of time that depends upontype of finish and thickness of film cheers, Bill-----------------------------------------------------Click here for Free Video!!http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/ ----- Original Message -----From: "CHRISTOPHER C MCDOWELL" mcdowellc@lanecc.edu> RODMAKERS@wugate.wustl.edu>Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 9:04 PMSubject: Humidity and Finishes While we're on this subject I have a question for those that have readuponthis subject in the woodworking magazines or elsewhere. Do thevariousfinishes differ in terms of how much total moisture is ever allowed tore-enter the rod or do they really only differ in the rate of time ittakes Also, do the finishes that provide a slower rate of ambiant moistureentry,in turn, provide a slower rate of ambiant moisture exiting the rod? Thanks,Chrismcdowellc@lanecc.edu from rafick@3riversweb.net Fri Mar 10 17:39:25 2000 0000 Subject: re.BFR I have been thinking about all the comments about the BFR mag.Instead of writing it off as a lost cause, wouldn't it be in the bestinterest of all cane rodmakers to see the idea succeed.?What can we do to help bring this about.? I don't know any details of theproblems other than the obvious $$$$$$ involved with putting out apublication such as this,(high quality) not a lot I can do about that.Any suggestions welcome. Rick R.A.Fick Bamboo FlyrodsThe best rods are being made today.www.angelfire.com/in2/rafickrods/ from harms1@prodigy.net Fri Mar 10 18:32:00 2000 Fri, 10 Mar 2000 19:31:44 -0500 Subject: Re: Stain?? boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0058_01BF8AC7.32D04C20" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0058_01BF8AC7.32D04C20 Well that's true of most anniline dyes, but there are some that do not =fade. Moreover, if one uses a good exterior-grade varnish (spar or =poly), these usually have the needed UV filters in the formula. cheers, Bill -----------------------------------------------------Click here for Free Video!!http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/ Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 9:44 AMSubject: Re: Stain?? The only problem with aniline dye is that it fades easily in sun =light, due the ultra-violet. A sun blocker is required to stop this. GMA Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 8:03 AMSubject: Re: Stain?? You might want to try the aniline dyes, as these are not stains, as =such. Stains gain their effect by depositing micro-particles of color =onto (and amongst) the surface grain, whereas dyes have no such =particles, so the thin liquid will sink right into the wood surface. = to add that I have not tried to dye bamboo. cheers, Bill-----------------------------------------------------Click here for Free Video!!http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/ From: "CHRISTOPHER C MCDOWELL" Sent: Thursday, March 09, 2000 3:37 PMSubject: re: Stain?? A long time ago I tried staining a bamboo blank. I used the = In my opinion it didn't work very well. The bamboo was so = didn't want to retain the color, and when I would wipe the excess = after allowing it to sit for a while, the color would wipe away = tried to leave it on a little thicker and the result was that it = to dry. I realize these problems may be specific to the product I = Chris ---------- Original Text ---------- From: "John Hewitt" , on 3/9/00 12:16 PM: To All,Just curious, has anyone ever used stain on a raw blank? =Or isthe only way to get color to heat treat or flame? What are the =plussesand or drawbacks to staining bamboo?John ------=_NextPart_000_0058_01BF8AC7.32D04C20 Well that's trueof = exterior-grade varnish (spar or poly), these usually have the needed UV = in the formula. Bill -----------------------------------------------------Clickhere = Free Video!!http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/ ----- Original Message ----- nobler = Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 = AMSubject: Re: Stain?? The only problem with aniline dye is that it fades easily in sun = due the ultra-violet. A sun blocker is required to stop this. GMA ----- Original Message ----- HARMS = Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 = AMSubject: Re: Stain?? You might wantto = effect by depositing micro-particles of color onto = to add that I = to dye bamboo. Bill------------------------------------------------- here for Free Video!!http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/----- Original= From: = Sent: Thursday,= 2000 3:37 PM Stain?? A = it on a little thicker and the result was that it didn't want = Just curious, has anyone ever used stain on a raw blank? Or = only way to get color to heat treat or flame? What are the = ------=_NextPart_000_0058_01BF8AC7.32D04C20-- from anglport@con2.com Fri Mar 10 21:42:29 2000 (SMTPD32-5.05) id A03926C6008C; Fri, 10 Mar 2000 22:40:41 -0500 Subject: RE: Humidity and Finishes All,As I'm sure John Channer and several others on the list will confirm,woodpanles like tabletops are supposed to be finished on both sides so that theconstant movement of the wood doesn't cause them to cup due to one sideabsorbing more moisture than the other. Not because one side WILL absorband the other WON'T, but because they'll do it at different rates. This isalso the reason that fully-finished panels are left to "float" in theframes of doors and carcases of bureaus etc. I have read this, disbelievedit, and personally confirmed it! Not on more than one piece, thankfully; IAM trainable!The stuff doesn't ever DIE! (I know, we're talking grass and not wood,but......) It's in constant movement as the seasons and ambienttemperatures and humidities change. I suspect all we ever do is fit thecane so that its natural swelling and shrinking is narrowed enough so it"lives" within the ferrule without shrivelling away from the inner surfaceor expanding so much it destroys its "confinement".I have built many pieces of furniture with varnish finishes whichwillstand a sweating ice-filled glass standing and dripping on the surface allnight and not show ill effects, but those same surfaces will change sizeorshape from August to Feb every lousy year.I must admit, I was surprised to read that Fine Woodworking articleawhileback on the benefits of immersing in wax over a good varnishing, but thebest we can do, I think, is to slow the absorption/release rate enough soit doesn't gallop back and forth like an overeager puppy!No scotch rings on my rods (but some on my planing forms),Art At 12:59 PM 03/10/2000 -0600, Kling, Barry W. wrote: Right. And if there was any doubt that rods adjust to ambient humidityregardless of finish, the recent posts on shrinking and growing ferrulesshould dispell them. If the bamboo inside a ferrule can change in watercontent, as they clearly do, the same must certainly happen in the rest ofthe rod. That being the case, I can't think of any reason the waterproofness of afinish would matter. BK -----Original Message----- Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 7:58 AM Subject: Re: Humidity and Finishes As far as water vapor (ambient humidity) passage through a film offinish isconcerned, it is: 1) inevitable; 2) unable to distinguish between enteringor exiting; 3) constantly occuring over a rate of time that depends upontype of finish and thickness of film cheers, Bill-----------------------------------------------------Click here for Free Video!!http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/ ----- Original Message ----- From: "CHRISTOPHER C MCDOWELL" mcdowellc@lanecc.edu> RODMAKERS@wugate.wustl.edu>Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2000 9:04 PMSubject: Humidity and Finishes While we're on this subject I have a question for those that have read upon this subject in the woodworking magazines or elsewhere. Do thevarious finishes differ in terms of how much total moisture is ever allowed to re- enter the rod or do they really only differ in the rate of time ittakes Also, do the finishes that provide a slower rate of ambiant moistureentry, in turn, provide a slower rate of ambiant moisture exiting the rod? Thanks,Chrismcdowellc@lanecc.edu from stpete@netten.net Fri Mar 10 22:15:14 2000 Fri, 10 Mar 2000 22:19:54 -0600 Subject: Reply to BFR - rant warning! do not read if easily offended. Rick, Of course it would be in our interest to see it succeed!! But is this alabor of love? OR, does the publisher expect to make a profit? Why doesthe publisher not send out a notice of his problems and what he is doingto correct them - he obviously has some major ones. Customers areusually understanding if they are dealt with honestly. At this point,however, it seems the most insurmountable obstacle for the future ofthis magazine is the one he is creating with the ill will generated byboth his failure to meet obligations AND his silence. I was quick tosend the check for the charter subscription, but I'll be hanged if I amgoing to support an entity that doesn't have the courtesy to let thecustomer know what is going on. Why should they have to rely on goodpeople like you, Darryl, Bret, and Ralph to stick up for them? Whycan't they send a monthly e-mail to this list and let the group knowwhat is going on? I learned to build rods as many of this list did. I had a book andsomehow found this group. I've learned more from the good people ofthis list than I have from the BFR. Too bad. There is just not enoughinterest to make it go I'm afraid. Fact is, it is probably moreimportant to professional rod builders and collectors than it is to theaverage Joe rodbuilder on this list. I'm sorry if Mr. Metcalf is havinga rough go of it. I don't sense that he cares one way or the otherabout the customer. After all the late issues and the public postingshere and on VFS about "what is happening with BFR?", the only word Ihave heard from Mr. Metcalf is that it is time for me to renew. I ammore than willing to pay for the magazine, but I feel it is time to letthis go and move on. Rick C. R.A.Fick wrote: I have been thinking about all the comments about the BFR mag.Instead of writing it off as a lost cause, wouldn't it be in the bestinterest of all cane rodmakers to see the idea succeed.?What can we do to help bring this about.? I don't know any details of theproblems other than the obvious $$$$$$ involved with putting out apublication such as this,(high quality) not a lot I can do about that.Any suggestions welcome. Rick R.A.Fick Bamboo FlyrodsThe best rods are being made today.www.angelfire.com/in2/rafickrods/ from paul.blakley@dtn.ntl.com Sat Mar 11 04:17:20 2000 helo=dtn.ntl.com) Subject: Re: Reply to BFR - rant warning! do not read if easily offended. Rick C, Agreed........Paul B "Rick C." wrote: Rick, Of course it would be in our interest to see it succeed!! But is this alabor of love? OR, does the publisher expect to make a profit? Why doesthe publisher not send out a notice of his problems and what he is doingto correct them - he obviously has some major ones. Customers areusually understanding if they are dealt with honestly. At this point,however, it seems the most insurmountable obstacle for the future ofthis magazine is the one he is creating with the ill will generated byboth his failure to meet obligations AND his silence. I was quick tosend the check for the charter subscription, but I'll be hanged if I amgoing to support an entity that doesn't have the courtesy to let thecustomer know what is going on. Why should they have to rely on goodpeople like you, Darryl, Bret, and Ralph to stick up for them? Whycan't they send a monthly e-mail to this list and let the group knowwhat is going on? I learned to build rods as many of this list did. I had a book andsomehow found this group. I've learned more from the good people ofthis list than I have from the BFR. Too bad. There is just not enoughinterest to make it go I'm afraid. Fact is, it is probably moreimportant to professional rod builders and collectors than it is to theaverage Joe rodbuilder on this list. I'm sorry if Mr. Metcalf is havinga rough go of it. I don't sense that he cares one way or the otherabout the customer. After all the late issues and the public postingshere and on VFS about "what is happening with BFR?", the only word Ihave heard from Mr. Metcalf is that it is time for me to renew. I ammore than willing to pay for the magazine, but I feel it is time to letthis go and move on. Rick C. R.A.Fick wrote: I have been thinking about all the comments about the BFR mag.Instead of writing it off as a lost cause, wouldn't it be in the bestinterest of all cane rodmakers to see the idea succeed.?What can we do to help bring this about.? I don't know any details oftheproblems other than the obvious $$$$$$ involved with putting out apublication such as this,(high quality) not a lot I can do about that.Any suggestions welcome. Rick R.A.Fick Bamboo FlyrodsThe best rods are being made today.www.angelfire.com/in2/rafickrods/ from nobler@satx.rr.com Sat Mar 11 07:21:05 2000 SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.357.35);Sat, 11 Mar 2000 07:21:34 -0600 Subject: Re: Reply to BFR - rant warning! do not read if easily offended. This is the main thing..........silence ! If we were given any encouragementthat he will fill orders even, I think most would ride it out with him. Youmay be correct Rick, about the volume not being enough to support it, butwith today's fly fishing population, it's hard to believe there's not enoughinterest. I ordered the back issues, because I found the one issue so interesting, andwas prepared to send another check for a new subscription, until I neverreceived the back issues ! GMA----- Original Message ----- Subject: Reply to BFR - rant warning! do not read if easily offended. Rick, Of course it would be in our interest to see it succeed!! But is this alabor of love? OR, does the publisher expect to make a profit? Why doesthe publisher not send out a notice of his problems and what he is doingto correct them - he obviously has some major ones. Customers areusually understanding if they are dealt with honestly. At this point,however, it seems the most insurmountable obstacle for the future ofthis magazine is the one he is creating with the ill will generated byboth his failure to meet obligations AND his silence. I was quick tosend the check for the charter subscription, but I'll be hanged if I amgoing to support an entity that doesn't have the courtesy to let thecustomer know what is going on. Why should they have to rely on goodpeople like you, Darryl, Bret, and Ralph to stick up for them? Whycan't they send a monthly e-mail to this list and let the group knowwhat is going on? I learned to build rods as many of this list did. I had a book andsomehow found this group. I've learned more from the good people ofthis list than I have from the BFR. Too bad. There is just not enoughinterest to make it go I'm afraid. Fact is, it is probably moreimportant to professional rod builders and collectors than it is to theaverage Joe rodbuilder on this list. I'm sorry if Mr. Metcalf is havinga rough go of it. I don't sense that he cares one way or the otherabout the customer. After all the late issues and the public postingshere and on VFS about "what is happening with BFR?", the only word Ihave heard from Mr. Metcalf is that it is time for me to renew. I ammore than willing to pay for the magazine, but I feel it is time to letthis go and move on. Rick C. R.A.Fick wrote: I have been thinking about all the comments about the BFR mag.Instead of writing it off as a lost cause, wouldn't it be in the bestinterest of all cane rodmakers to see the idea succeed.?What can we do to help bring this about.? I don't know any details oftheproblems other than the obvious $$$$$$ involved with putting out apublication such as this,(high quality) not a lot I can do about that.Any suggestions welcome. Rick R.A.Fick Bamboo FlyrodsThe best rods are being made today.www.angelfire.com/in2/rafickrods/ from FISHWOOL@aol.com Sat Mar 11 07:46:32 2000 Subject: Re: Turnaround for REC components I've had the same experience that Ray has had-all good.Hank. from FISHWOOL@aol.com Sat Mar 11 07:48:55 2000 Subject: Re: tapers Frank and Jerry,Just a short note to thank you both for your excellent work. While I haven't used everything available that you've developed for the rodmakers (I'm still graphing my tapers to design or alter them-some will never seethe light of day again :) ), what I have used has been great.Regards,Hank. from ernie2@pacbell.net Sat Mar 11 09:09:38 2000 sims.3.5.1999.09.16.21.57.p8)with SMTP id for Subject: Re: Taper alteration Thanks to every one who responded to my question, My problem was thatsometapers did not include the part under the grip and reel seat and did notstate this.Ernie Harrison -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: Taper alteration Hi Ernie,If you would like to send me the existing taper of the rod in 5"incrementsalong with the line size you plan to use and an indication of whether ornotthere is any broken or damaged pieces, I'd be glad to run a computeranalysis for you and give you a recommendation.Ray----- Original Message -----From: Ernie Harrison Sent: Friday, March 10, 2000 7:03 AMSubject: Taper alteration What is the correct way of shortening a 5 weight taper from 91 inchesto80inches and what effects would it have on the completed rod? The roddesignis given as a 7.5 foot rod but it's actual measured length is 91 inches.Ernie Harrison from oossg@vbe.com Sat Mar 11 09:51:10 2000 Subject: Re: re.BFR boundary="------------F5A9B217A9B5D68AB99AC930" --------------F5A9B217A9B5D68AB99AC930 RickI agree with you that we should want to see this mag succeed. I sent e- mailto the BFR and offered to send a self addressed STAMPED envelope to sendmethe latest edition.I never received any reply. Very disappointed.Scott "R.A.Fick" wrote: I have been thinking about all the comments about the BFR mag.Instead of writing it off as a lost cause, wouldn't it be in the bestinterest of all cane rodmakers to see the idea succeed.?What can we do to help bring this about.? I don't know any details of theproblems other than the obvious $$$$$$ involved with putting out apublication such as this,(high quality) not a lot I can do about that.Any suggestions welcome. Rick R.A.Fick Bamboo FlyrodsThe best rods are being made today.www.angelfire.com/in2/rafickrods/ --------------F5A9B217A9B5D68AB99AC930 Rick STAMPEDenvelope to send me the latest edition. Scott"R.A.Fick" wrote:I have been thinking about all the comments aboutthe BFR mag.Instead of writing it off as a lost cause, wouldn't it be in the bestinterest of all cane rodmakers to see the idea succeed.?What can we do to help bring this about.? I don't know any detailsof theproblems other than the obvious $$$$$$ involved with putting out apublication such as this,(high quality) not a lot I can do about that.Any suggestions welcome.RickR.A.Fick Bamboo FlyrodsThe best rods are being made today.www.angelfire.com/in2/rafickrods/ --------------F5A9B217A9B5D68AB99AC930-- from ggwillia@bellsouth.net Sat Mar 11 10:41:13 2000 Subject: South Bend Reel Seat I'm looking for a South Bend reel seat manufactured during the 50'sand 60's if anyone has one they'd like to sell. Thanks. from paul.blakley@dtn.ntl.com Sat Mar 11 11:40:52 2000 helo=dtn.ntl.com) Mar 2000 17:33:16 +0000 Subject: Abercrombie & Fitch Hardy Banty Rods Can anyone on the list supply me with a taper for the Hardy 4'4" BantyRod they produced for the New York sporting goods store Abercrombie andFitch ?Any other details about this particular model would also be appreciated.Hardy's have one of these rods in there museum in Alnwick, England butall attempts to get an inspection of the rod or details released havebeen unsuccesful. Many thanks......Paul B from nsflyrods@ns.sympatico.ca Sat Mar 11 13:49:08 2000 Sat, 11 Mar 2000 15:48:35 -0400 Subject: Re: Abercrombie & Fitch Hardy Banty Rods I would also like to see that. ThanksShawn Pineo paul.blakley@dtn.ntl.com wrote: Can anyone on the list supply me with a taper for the Hardy 4'4" BantyRod they produced for the New York sporting goods store AbercrombieandFitch ?Any other details about this particular model would also be appreciated.Hardy's have one of these rods in there museum in Alnwick, England butall attempts to get an inspection of the rod or details released havebeen unsuccesful. Many thanks......Paul B from chris@artistree.com Sat Mar 11 13:54:10 2000 Subject: Re: South Bend Reel Seat This is just an idea...well...actually I did do it once. I used a SouthBend Reel Seat off one of their fiberglass rods as replacement. Workedout well.-- Regards, Chris Wohlfordemail: chris@artistree.com Gary Williams wrote: I'm looking for a South Bend reel seat manufactured during the 50'sand 60's if anyone has one they'd like to sell. Thanks. from richard.nantel@videotron.ca Sat Mar 11 14:40:56 2000 Internet Mail Serversims.3.5.1999.12.14.10.29.p8)with SMTP id forrodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 15:39:53 Subject: Guide placement I'm just finishing an F.E. Thomas, 6'8" 3 wt from Howell's book. Wouldanyone have a decent guide placement for such a rod? Thanks in advance, Richard from saweiss@flash.net Sat Mar 11 15:04:03 2000 Subject: Re: is this good cane? Gary,The ones that I've broken like that, I've overheated. If the strip isotherwise worthy, You can scarf repair it as though it were a nodelesssplice.Steve i was straightening a piece of newly split cane last night. while holdinganode over the heat gun, and applying my usual amount of (semi gentle)pressure, the piece broke off, about a quarter inch from the node. breakwas clean and straight, rather than having the brush- like effect offiberson each side. i've made two rods on the same heat gun setting, samemethods, &c., without having seen such a phenom before. any commentsonthequality of the culm? i seem to recall seeing a picture of a similar breakin a book somewhere, and reading that it indicated a poor culm, but idon'tremember where. tks, glm--------------------gary mischcdr, usn (ret.) from dannyt@frisurf.no Sat Mar 11 15:23:03 2000 (MET) Subject: PHY Princess Does anybody on the list have the taper for the PHY Princess?I've search the archive but couldn't find it.... TIAdanny ------>--------work from KlingB@health.missouri.edu Sat Mar 11 16:48:24 2000 Subject: RE: Ferrule Material Bob - With a similar no-flame disclaimer......my Dad is also an engineer and Ilove him very much. But one of the things I've learned about engineers isthat in the absence of empirical testing they can come up with a very niceexplanation, complete with math, for whatever seems likely to them. Theelegance and plausibility of the explanation has little relationship to itscorrectness. Sometimes engineers even prefer their reasoning to reality.Inresponse to this my father coined one of my favorite expressions. When hewould be out on the testing range in New Mexico or somewhere like that(hewas in aerospace) and something went wrong and the engineers couldn'tunderstand it, they often called it a random failure. The next timesomething worked, my father would say it didn't mean a damn thing, andwhenthey asked why he'd explain it was just a random success. So my conclusion is.....don't be so sure until it is tested in the realworld. Barry -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: Ferrule Material Darrell,Before you read this, understand that I am not trying to beat you todeath with numbers, but being an engineer by nature, I look at thingsfrommechanical advantage/disadvantage points when I hear of a new idea orinnovation... so don't take this wrong, but I did a little tinkeringaroundlast nite in the shop just to see what making the kind of tip over buttjoint you suggest would involve. Now, read it with a smile, and don'ttakeanything as a flame here, it is just my point of view backed by a littlemeasuring, weighing and calculating.I understand your point about wanting to see if something can bedonethat hasn't, and to a certain extent, I understand wanting to try thingsnew, and that many of traditionalist (and I guess I am one to a certainextent) don't want to hear about anything new being tried. My point is,that ferrules are cheap, and making a ferrule on a lathe is morecost/timeeffective than trying to make a tapered fit bamboo "joint" on a rod.Yourpoint did get me curious, and I tried to set down and do a little numbercrunching, and I think if you will do the same, you can see that thecastingcharacteristics of a rod with a tapered bamboo joint/ferrule would bemuchmore affected than you think it would. The taper would have to bedrastically altered, especially in the first 10 inches aft of the joint.Ithink your wieght concerns over the nickel silver ferrules would beinsignificant. The amount of cane that would have to be added wouldweighmore than a set of ferrules with walls 0.0175" thick (typical of a SuperZtype ferrule). Considering the stress, shear and strain values of bamboocompared to that of 18% nickel silver, the bamboo would have to be about8.5times as thick to have the same effective strength as the Nickel silverferrules... that would make a typical joint have to be almost .30"largerthan a traditional NS ferrule joint, plus, since you have to taper up tothis joint, then, even if you do it very rapidly, lets say you have a2.5"area over which the "swell" is developed then allow an inch for thetaperedfit on the butt end of it, then you have added a piece of bamboo thatweighs6.4 grams... an 11/64ths Super Z type ferrule weighs 5.0 grams (notguessingat these, weighed on my triple beam scales, both ferrules and bamboo...andI did take a piece of scrap end cut from a blank, basically straightsandedon my belt sander, from a 1/2d inch section down to a .250d over theareawhere the swell would have to put when planed or milled in, drilled theendof the scrap with a 1/8" bit and used a violin peg reamer to ream out atapered hole in the end for a butt section to go into... didn't takelong, Ihave plenty of scrap! LOL) so you are, actually not removing weight bygetting rid of the NS ferrule, but adding weight. Note that the actualdimensions of my little test piece is about .050" smaller than whatwould berequired to have the same strength as a NS ferrule, so the weight wouldprobably be an couple of tenths of a gram more. This much differencewoulddefinitely require more "meat" in the butt section which adds moreweight tothe overall rod. Pretty much, it would be like putting the weight of a17/64ths superZ ferrule on a 4 weight rod. That is a lot of difference.And again, I must reiterate aesthetics. You have a rod with a tipsectionthat would be, normally, relatively small at it's thickest point, letssay.162 on my 6' 2wt, at its largest point, that now has a swell in itthat, inorder to be strong and reliable, that would now have to be swelled up to.462... That is a half inch lump in the middle of an otherwisesteamlineddelicate rod... that normally weighs 48.5 grams (just finished one so itwasconvenient to weigh the 2 wt) or 1.7 ounces, that now has at least 1.4gramsmore at the ferrule location(the bamboo of the butt has to fill thetaperedhole, so that would add another 2 grams to the joint) and (justestimatinghere) probably another 4 grams added overall in the butt section to addthematerial necessary to make up for the heavier ferrule, adding a total ofatleast 5.4 grams to the overall weight of the rod, making it over .2ouncesheavier than a NS ferruled rod.As far as the power fiber issue, I do have to disagree on that. Ihavebuilt over 200 rods to day, and restored God knows how many. I triedthisconcept of removing outer material from a rod to change its castingcharacteristics on older 9 footers in making them into 6 footers forotherpeople, and my experience is that the rods cast like shit when you starttaking off very much of the outer layers. The inner layer of cane ispithand has no grain... that is all the power fibers are is the grain of thegrass, and without those, the grass (cane) loses a lot of thecharacteristics that make it what it is...You have done a lot of things and posted them on this list that areveryinteresting, very good, very innovative, and I appreciate that, but Ifailto see where there would be any advantage to an innovation that wouldmake arod bulkier and heavier for the sake of saving the cost of a set offerrules.One final note, if you are going try this, I would like to suggestthatyou contact a Luthiers supply house and get a violin peg shave (like averyaccurate pencil sharpener) and a tapered reamer built for violin pegs.Thiswould give you as perfect a fit as possible on your tapered joint. Ihave aset, and if I remember right, they only cost about 30 each and I thinkInternational Violin Supply (you can find them somewhere on the net)carriesthem. OK, Now I have a brain cramp and need more coffee! *S* Later,Bob -----Original Message----- Subject: Re: Ferrule Material I think you have the wrong idea about my experimentsin rod building. It isn't to make a rod to sell for$1000.00. Mostly it is to see if it can be done.People making cane rods are so tradition bound, andeveryone is so afraid to do something different becauseit might not be accepted by other cane rod people thatnothing innovative ever gets tried. Swelling the butt end of a tip section can't bedone over short enoughof a physical area to NOT have a noticable effect thestress curve and theway the rod casts. Even if this does have a noticeable effect on the stresscurve, well then, adjust the taper to compensate! Well, now you have to turndown the tip end of the butt section to go inside it, so unless younearlydouble the dimension of the butt end of the tip, then you are goingtohaveto turn the majority of the power fibers off of the end of the buttsectionto get it to fit inside the tip... As I have said before - "power fibers" at least whatmost people call "power fibers" (the layer of tinyfibers right under the enamel) are highly overrated.I have made rods where I planed away all the "powerfibers" and the rod casts fine. It is not a softnoodle, it does not break at the touch of a feather,it casts and fishes just fine. And no, the taper isn't massive to compensate for theadded weight. Remember we are getting rid of the weightof the metal ferrule, and even more bamboo for the swelled sectiondoesn'tweigh as much as the metal. Darryl from nsflyrods@ns.sympatico.ca Sat Mar 11 17:01:11 2000 Subject: Thanks I would just like to thank everyone who sent positive counters to thenegative "FERTILIZER" I received from a couple of people this past weekabout franken tools. Everyone is entitled to their opinion I guess ;^)I have a lot of fun with these tools and the funny comments andquestions they produce. Hopefully once things die down a bit (do theyever really die down?) after this sportsman's show I will try to updatethe page a bit and maybe even finally get my web page done.Thanks again,Shawn from caneman@clnk.com Sat Mar 11 17:32:00 2000 (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-61365U2500L250S0V35)with SMTP id com; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 17:28:45 -0600 "Rod Makers List Serve" Subject: Re: Ferrule Material Barry,I understand what you are saying and by no means take it as a flame,andI wasn't telling Darryl not to try it, as a matter of fact, I even suggestedwhere he could get the proper tools to make the taper fit he wants tomake,as precise as would be necessary.You are right, it's my nature I guess to make assumptions based onempirical evidence (math, measuring and weighing of the pieces, etc.) andtheory and not so much on testing. My point is, if I am going to design anew and improved duck, and I do all the calculations build some of theparts, do the math and measurements, then I put all the parts and figuresonpaper, scaled carefully, and it looks more like an elephant than a duck,then I am not going to build. Especially when I have a shop full ofperfectly good "traditional" duck parts. Darryl was right to wonder, andshould continue on to build this if he so desires. Nothing wrong with that,and I would like to see what it turns out like and how well it functions asopposed to a traditional rod. Darryl took my message as being degrading,while, if he had read it completely, he would have seen that he sparked mycuriosity so much that I DID make a tapered section of bamboo with ataperedhole in it, much like I understood his "over the butt" ferrule idea torepresent, and after weighing it found it to be heavier than a NS ferrule.Only difference was that when I built the bamboo "ferrule" to see if it hadany merit, I relied on known properties and values and not on merely "letmetry it this way". As one who is obviously educated in the sciences, I feelsure you understand my approach.To be honest, now I wish I hadn't screwed with it at all. Darryl gothis feelings hurt because either I disagreed with the validity of his idea,or because of the comment I made about removing the power fibers from acanerod (not sure which one yanked his chain, but obviously one of them did),and my goal was definitely not to hurt his feelings, rather was to showhimand anyone else on the list what I found out using a somewhat scientificapproach to "paper testing" his idea. If he hadn't been so overly sensitiveand so obviously offended that someone might challenge his idea, then hecould have written "Bob, do you mind telling me more about what you did?Howlong was the piece you measured? What kind of scales did you use? Do youthink there is a different way of doing this?" Instead, he chose to fireback at me in a tone that was obviously smarta$$, not only to me but toeveryone else on the list.I still say, however, that if he tries this and it works, I'll be thefirst one in line to say "Darryl, I was WRONG!!!", but still think, even onthe long chance that it does work, it is still going to be an ugly joint...Another concern I had about it was the tapered joint... a taper fit isgreat for compression or for rational strength... no good at all for theshear stresses and strains caused by casting. Again, NO test here, but canjust picture two false casts, and then the tip going out into the current. Later,Bob-----Original Message----- Subject: RE: Ferrule Material Bob - With a similar no-flame disclaimer......my Dad is also an engineer and Ilove him very much. But one of the things I've learned about engineers isthat in the absence of empirical testing they can come up with a veryniceexplanation, complete with math, for whatever seems likely to them. Theelegance and plausibility of the explanation has little relationship to itscorrectness. Sometimes engineers even prefer their reasoning to reality.Inresponse to this my father coined one of my favorite expressions. Whenhewould be out on the testing range in New Mexico or somewhere like that(hewas in aerospace) and something went wrong and the engineers couldn'tunderstand it, they often called it a random failure. The next timesomething worked, my father would say it didn't mean a damn thing, andwhenthey asked why he'd explain it was just a random success. So my conclusion is.....don't be so sure until it is tested in the realworld. Barry -----Original Message-----From: Bob Nunley Sent: 3/10/00 10:54 AMSubject: Re: Ferrule Material Darrell,Before you read this, understand that I am not trying to beat you todeath with numbers, but being an engineer by nature, I look at thingsfrommechanical advantage/disadvantage points when I hear of a new idea orinnovation... so don't take this wrong, but I did a little tinkeringaroundlast nite in the shop just to see what making the kind of tip over buttjoint you suggest would involve. Now, read it with a smile, and don'ttakeanything as a flame here, it is just my point of view backed by a littlemeasuring, weighing and calculating.I understand your point about wanting to see if something can bedonethat hasn't, and to a certain extent, I understand wanting to try thingsnew, and that many of traditionalist (and I guess I am one to a certainextent) don't want to hear about anything new being tried. My point is,that ferrules are cheap, and making a ferrule on a lathe is morecost/timeeffective than trying to make a tapered fit bamboo "joint" on a rod.Yourpoint did get me curious, and I tried to set down and do a little numbercrunching, and I think if you will do the same, you can see that thecastingcharacteristics of a rod with a tapered bamboo joint/ferrule would bemuchmore affected than you think it would. The taper would have to bedrastically altered, especially in the first 10 inches aft of the joint.Ithink your wieght concerns over the nickel silver ferrules would beinsignificant. The amount of cane that would have to be added wouldweighmore than a set of ferrules with walls 0.0175" thick (typical of a SuperZtype ferrule). Considering the stress, shear and strain values of bamboocompared to that of 18% nickel silver, the bamboo would have to be about8.5times as thick to have the same effective strength as the Nickel silverferrules... that would make a typical joint have to be almost .30"largerthan a traditional NS ferrule joint, plus, since you have to taper up tothis joint, then, even if you do it very rapidly, lets say you have a2.5"area over which the "swell" is developed then allow an inch for thetaperedfit on the butt end of it, then you have added a piece of bamboo thatweighs6.4 grams... an 11/64ths Super Z type ferrule weighs 5.0 grams (notguessingat these, weighed on my triple beam scales, both ferrules and bamboo...andI did take a piece of scrap end cut from a blank, basically straightsandedon my belt sander, from a 1/2d inch section down to a .250d over theareawhere the swell would have to put when planed or milled in, drilled theendof the scrap with a 1/8" bit and used a violin peg reamer to ream out atapered hole in the end for a butt section to go into... didn't takelong, Ihave plenty of scrap! LOL) so you are, actually not removing weight bygetting rid of the NS ferrule, but adding weight. Note that the actualdimensions of my little test piece is about .050" smaller than whatwould berequired to have the same strength as a NS ferrule, so the weight wouldprobably be an couple of tenths of a gram more. This much differencewoulddefinitely require more "meat" in the butt section which adds moreweight tothe overall rod. Pretty much, it would be like putting the weight of a17/64ths superZ ferrule on a 4 weight rod. That is a lot of difference.And again, I must reiterate aesthetics. You have a rod with a tipsectionthat would be, normally, relatively small at it's thickest point, letssay.162 on my 6' 2wt, at its largest point, that now has a swell in itthat, inorder to be strong and reliable, that would now have to be swelled up to.462... That is a half inch lump in the middle of an otherwisesteamlineddelicate rod... that normally weighs 48.5 grams (just finished one so itwasconvenient to weigh the 2 wt) or 1.7 ounces, that now has at least 1.4gramsmore at the ferrule location(the bamboo of the butt has to fill thetaperedhole, so that would add another 2 grams to the joint) and (justestimatinghere) probably another 4 grams added overall in the butt section to addthematerial necessary to make up for the heavier ferrule, adding a total ofatleast 5.4 grams to the overall weight of the rod, making it over .2ouncesheavier than a NS ferruled rod.As far as the power fiber issue, I do have to disagree on that. Ihavebuilt over 200 rods to day, and restored God knows how many. I triedthisconcept of removing outer material from a rod to change its castingcharacteristics on older 9 footers in making them into 6 footers forotherpeople, and my experience is that the rods cast like shit when you starttaking off very much of the outer layers. The inner layer of cane ispithand has no grain... that is all the power fibers are is the grain of thegrass, and without those, the grass (cane) loses a lot of thecharacteristics that make it what it is...You have done a lot of things and posted them on this list that areveryinteresting, very good, very innovative, and I appreciate that, but Ifailto see where there would be any advantage to an innovation that wouldmake arod bulkier and heavier for the sake of saving the cost of a set offerrules.One final note, if you are going try this, I would like to suggestthatyou contact a Luthiers supply house and get a violin peg shave (like averyaccurate pencil sharpener) and a tapered reamer built for violin pegs.Thiswould give you as perfect a fit as possible on your tapered joint. Ihave aset, and if I remember right, they only cost about 30 each and I thinkInternational Violin Supply (you can find them somewhere on the net)carriesthem. OK, Now I have a brain cramp and need more coffee! *S* Later,Bob -----Original Message-----From: DNHayashida@aol.com Date: Thursday, March 09, 2000 9:40 AMSubject: Re: Ferrule Material I think you have the wrong idea about my experimentsin rod building. It isn't to make a rod to sell for$1000.00. Mostly it is to see if it can be done.People making cane rods are so tradition bound, andeveryone is so afraid to do something different becauseit might not be accepted by other cane rod people thatnothing innovative ever gets tried. Swelling the butt end of a tip section can't bedone over short enoughof a physical area to NOT have a noticable effect thestress curve and theway the rod casts. Even if this does have a noticeable effect on the stresscurve, well then, adjust the taper to compensate! Well, now you have to turndown the tip end of the butt section to go inside it, so unless younearlydouble the dimension of the butt end of the tip, then you are goingtohaveto turn the majority of the power fibers off of the end of the buttsectionto get it to fit inside the tip... As I have said before - "power fibers" at least whatmost people call "power fibers" (the layer of tinyfibers right under the enamel) are highly overrated.I have made rods where I planed away all the "powerfibers" and the rod casts fine. It is not a softnoodle, it does not break at the touch of a feather,it casts and fishes just fine. And no, the taper isn't massive to compensate for theadded weight. Remember we are getting rid of the weightof the metal ferrule, and even more bamboo for the swelled sectiondoesn'tweigh as much as the metal. Darryl from caneman@clnk.com Sat Mar 11 17:41:56 2000 (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-61365U2500L250S0V35)with SMTP id com for ;Sat, 11 Mar 2000 17:38:45 -0600 Subject: correction to post boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001A_01BF8B80.EA10AF60" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_001A_01BF8B80.EA10AF60 on the last post I made great for compression or for rational strengthshould have beengreat for compression or for rotational strength Bob ------=_NextPart_000_001A_01BF8B80.EA10AF60 on the last post I made compression or for rational strength should have been strength Bob ------=_NextPart_000_001A_01BF8B80.EA10AF60-- from mschaffer@mindspring.com Sat Mar 11 20:52:16 2000 Subject: John Bokstrom's splitting technique Hey gang,I just finished splitting for another rod, this time using John Bokstrom'stechnique and if you haven't tried it, you should! I've split a couple ofdifferent ways, and this method yielded the greatest number of strips andthe easiest splitting I've yet done ( not that I'm Mr. Experience by anymeans).Being that this next rod is to be another blond rod, and having had muchohassls the last time I split for a blond rod, I tried something different.This time prior to splitting I heated the culm sections to 250 degrees for10 minutes to drive off some of the moisture, then started splitting. Iused this temp because I figured that it would be low enough not to impartmuch, if any, color change, yet be high enough to drive off some of theinternal moisture, thus better splitting. It seemed to work out the way Ihad hoped, and using John's method, I've had an enjoyable splittingsession.Now, if someone would send me John's email address, I would like tocontacthim privately.Thanks guys, Mike from richard.nantel@videotron.ca Sat Mar 11 20:58:32 2000 Internet Mail Serversims.3.5.1999.12.14.10.29.p8)with SMTP id forrodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 21:58:27 Subject: Guide placement I spent a good part of this evening trying to work out a good guideplacement scheme for my F.E. Thomas 6'8" 3 wt taper. The closest ready-madeguide placement I could find was in Garrison's book, for his 6'9" taper.There were two things I didn't like about this placement, however. Thestripping guide was only 22 3/4 inches from the butt a bit close I feel.Also, Garrison uses 9 guides for this this fairly short rod. Jack Howellhas a chart for a 6'6" guide placement in his book that uses one less guideand places the ferrule guide on the tip section rather than the butt.Pretty neat idea but I still needed to do some adjustments for my slightlylonger taper. I then remembered Wayne's Guide program that came on the Hexrod disk.Whata great tool!! Using Wayne's program, I quickly came up with a guideplacement which looks pretty good. Since this rod is quite popular, here isthe guide placement I came up with. Perhaps this will save someone a fewhours work. tip top5 1/810 13/1617233038 1/2 (just above ferrule) 46 5/855 5/16 (stripping guide 24 7/16 from butt) If anyone knows the actual guide placement on this rod, I'd love to knowit. Thanks, Wayne, for a really useful tool. Richard from stpete@netten.net Sat Mar 11 21:27:20 2000 Sat, 11 Mar 2000 21:32:06 -0600 Subject: Re: Guide placement Thanks, Richard! I just split out strips for that taper this veryevening. Saved me some time and I appreciate it. Rick C. Richard Nantel wrote: I spent a good part of this evening trying to work out a good guideplacement scheme for my F.E. Thomas 6'8" 3 wt taper. The closest ready-madeguide placement I could find was in Garrison's book, for his 6'9" taper.There were two things I didn't like about this placement, however. Thestripping guide was only 22 3/4 inches from the butt a bit close I feel.Also, Garrison uses 9 guides for this this fairly short rod. Jack Howellhas a chart for a 6'6" guide placement in his book that uses one lessguideand places the ferrule guide on the tip section rather than the butt.Pretty neat idea but I still needed to do some adjustments for myslightlylonger taper. I then remembered Wayne's Guide program that came on the Hexrod disk.Whata great tool!! Using Wayne's program, I quickly came up with a guideplacement which looks pretty good. Since this rod is quite popular, hereisthe guide placement I came up with. Perhaps this will save someone afewhours work. tip top5 1/810 13/1617233038 1/2 (just above ferrule) 46 5/855 5/16 (stripping guide 24 7/16 from butt) If anyone knows the actual guide placement on this rod, I'd love to knowit. Thanks, Wayne, for a really useful tool. Richard from ldavis@coweblink.net Sat Mar 11 22:35:12 2000 COWEBLINK1(MailMax 3.064) with ESMTP id14877310 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2000 21:34:37-0700 MST Subject: Wayne's Guide Program I then remembered Wayne's Guide program that came on the Hexrod disk Is the program available anyplace else? Lowell DavisWinter Park Colorado from nobler@satx.rr.com Sat Mar 11 22:55:54 2000 SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.357.35);Sat, 11 Mar 2000 22:45:01 -0600 Subject: Re: John Bokstrom's splitting technique Can anyone send a copy of this technique, or where to find it ? I thought Irecalled saving it, but NOT ! Thanks, GMA----- Original Message ----- Subject: John Bokstrom's splitting technique Hey gang,I just finished splitting for another rod, this time using John Bokstrom'stechnique and if you haven't tried it, you should! I've split a couple ofdifferent ways, and this method yielded the greatest number of stripsandthe easiest splitting I've yet done ( not that I'm Mr. Experience by anymeans).Being that this next rod is to be another blond rod, and having had muchohassls the last time I split for a blond rod, I tried something different.This time prior to splitting I heated the culm sections to 250 degreesfor10 minutes to drive off some of the moisture, then started splitting. Iused this temp because I figured that it would be low enough not toimpartmuch, if any, color change, yet be high enough to drive off some of theinternal moisture, thus better splitting. It seemed to work out the way Ihad hoped, and using John's method, I've had an enjoyable splittingsession.Now, if someone would send me John's email address, I would like tocontacthim privately.Thanks guys, Mike from fbcwin@3g.quik.com Sat Mar 11 23:25:38 2000 Sat, 11 Mar 2000 21:25:30 -0800 Subject: Re: John Bokstrom's splitting technique George, John's technique is on Frank Neunemann's (sp?) page. There's a link to it from Rodmakers.Harry nobler wrote: Can anyone send a copy of this technique, or where to find it ? I thought Irecalled saving it, but NOT ! --Harry Boydhttp://HarryBoydbamboorods.eboard.com/ from saweiss@flash.net Sat Mar 11 23:25:53 2000 Subject: Re: Abercrombie & Fitch Hardy Banty Rods Per a message from Ray Gould:The Hardy A&F Banty 4'-4" x 2pc x 1 ounce rod:0 = 0,070, 5 = 0.088, 10 = 0.107, 15 = 0.0.119, 20 = 0.133, 25 = 0.146. 30= 0.175,35 = 0.182, 40 = 0.190, 45 = 0.205 (estimate under cork). These dimensions were taken on unvarnished cane. I would also like to see that. ThanksShawn Pineo paul.blakley@dtn.ntl.com wrote: Can anyone on the list supply me with a taper for the Hardy 4'4" BantyRod they produced for the New York sporting goods store AbercrombieandFitch ?Any other details about this particular model would also beappreciated.Hardy's have one of these rods in there museum in Alnwick, England butall attempts to get an inspection of the rod or details released havebeen unsuccesful. Many thanks......Paul B from mrmac@tcimet.net Sun Mar 12 05:22:18 2000 (envelope- from mrmac@tcimet.net) Subject: Varmor R10 OK, finally I got the "right stuff", the R10, from my not so localsupplier. Opened the can this morning in eager anticipation of it'swonders and was somewhat surprised to see that it was not clear, butrather, had a lot of suspended flakey sorta stuff and also what lookedlike a lot of "dust" type particulate matter floating all around in it. Help! Is this the normal appearance for R10, or do I have a bad quart? Thanks, once again, for your comments and help. mac from rsgould@cmc.net Sun Mar 12 08:55:01 2000 Subject: Re: Varmor R10 Hi Ralph,I had the same experience on a recent order of R-10 and returned the cantothe supplier who then replaced it at no charge. The replacement was clearasis normal and works perfectly as it has for so many years.Ray---- - Original Message ----- Subject: Varmor R10 OK, finally I got the "right stuff", the R10, from my not so localsupplier. Opened the can this morning in eager anticipation of it'swonders and was somewhat surprised to see that it was not clear, butrather, had a lot of suspended flakey sorta stuff and also what lookedlike a lot of "dust" type particulate matter floating all around in it. Help! Is this the normal appearance for R10, or do I have a bad quart? Thanks, once again, for your comments and help. mac from stpete@netten.net Sun Mar 12 09:12:13 2000 Subject: [Fwd: BFR might make me eat some of my words] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------57C15214F0D This message never showed up on my e-mail, though I'm getting othersmessages. I'm sending it again. Sorry if it is a duplicate. Or ifMike has decided to delete this for breaking some rule regardingcommercialism. Rick --------------57C15214F0D Subject: BFR might make me eat some of my words Well, I received an e-mail from the BAMBOO FLY ROD today! It was quitepositive, but didn't let me in on the status of the magazine's viabilityor the possible ship dates. I have asked them to consider sending aninformative notice of such to this list. I don't know what constraintsthey feel that they have with such discussions in this or any otherforum, but I think that it would go a long way in restoring the faith oftheir customers in the magazine. Rick Crenshaw --------------57C15214F0D-- from horsesho@ptd.net Sun Mar 12 09:22:59 2000 0000 (204.186.33.105) Subject: Re: Varmor R10 Ray Gould wrote: Hi Ralph,I had the same experience on a recent order of R-10 and returned the cantothe supplier who then replaced it at no charge. The replacement wasclear asis normal and works perfectly as it has for so many years.Ray---- - Original Message -----From: Ralph MacKenzie Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 3:21 AMSubject: Varmor R10 OK, finally I got the "right stuff", the R10, from my not so localsupplier. Opened the can this morning in eager anticipation of it'swonders and was somewhat surprised to see that it was not clear, butrather, had a lot of suspended flakey sorta stuff and also what lookedlike a lot of "dust" type particulate matter floating all around in it. Help! Is this the normal appearance for R10, or do I have a bad quart? Thanks, once again, for your comments and help. mac I had the same problem. I bought 2 qts and one qt was clear and one hadthe problem you spoke of. Istrained the qt and had no problems. Marty from richard.nantel@videotron.ca Sun Mar 12 09:44:11 2000 Internet Mail Serversims.3.5.1999.12.14.10.29.p8)with SMTP id forrodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 10:33:15 Subject: RE: BFR might make me eat some of my words Only list members can post to the list so perhaps ask BFR to send thenotice to you and you can then forward it to the list. Richard -----Original Message----- Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2000 7:50 PM Subject: BFR might make me eat some of my words Well, I received an e-mail from the BAMBOO FLY ROD today! Itwas quitepositive, but didn't let me in on the status of themagazine's viabilityor the possible ship dates. I have asked them to consider sending aninformative notice of such to this list. I don't know whatconstraintsthey feel that they have with such discussions in this or any otherforum, but I think that it would go a long way in restoringthe faith oftheir customers in the magazine. Rick Crenshaw from tlongair@home.com Sun Mar 12 13:33:14 2000 (InterMail v4.01.01.07 201-229-111-110) with ESMTP 0800 Subject: heat treating Hi all,Thanks for your recipes for heat treating. Now I have a problem, my heat gun setup didn't work as well aspreviously and over 1 1/2 feet of the strips Max temperatures of 400degrees for 5 - 7 minutes was achieved. The cane over this area turned adarker colour. My problem is, this section doesn't plane as well as thelighter area and the shavings are crumbly and dry. The strips seem tobend in a U without breaking. Is there a way to determine if the stripsare overheated? Should I take a chance and finish the rod or cut mylosses and begin again? Thanks. Terry Longair from martinjensen@home.com Sun Mar 12 14:29:09 2000 (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP Sun, 12 Mar 2000 12:29:07 -0800 Subject: RE: heat treating I like a destructive test. A test to the death so to speak. Take a"over- heated" strip and an unheated strip from the same culm and bendthemuntil breaking. Do they both feel the same when they break? Don't have aspare spline? Are the splines long enough so that you can sacrifice a bitoff of one end? Start by breaking a bunch of the scrap strips that you(must) have. Breaking them is a really good way to feel the strength ofthebamboo and also so you get the "feel" of what you are working with.If the spline just snaps in half, then it is junk. If it is keep breaking itso that you will get the feel of bad vs. good.If it breaks like the unheated stuff, then go for it and build a rod. If itends up being crap (unlikely but it is possible) you haven't really wastedanything. You have just refined your overall rod building skills. Kind of awin win situation. Again, if it just breaks, I wouldn't bother building withit. I would use it for break testing. This is really important I think.IMHO from my experience, from what you have described, I'm betting thatyourbamboo is good. when you temper the bamboo, it will plane a little harderand as you have described. Remember, it is not as soft as it once was.Now if you just heat treated a section of 1.5 ft, well you are going to havesome interesting action there in addition to most likely a noticeable colordifference. All in all though, I wouldn't let just that one factor stop me from proceeding.Martin Jensen -----Original Message----- Subject: heat treating Hi all,Thanks for your recipes for heat treating.Now I have a problem, my heat gun setup didn't work as well aspreviously and over 1 1/2 feet of the strips Max temperatures of 400degrees for 5 - 7 minutes was achieved. The cane over this area turned adarker colour. My problem is, this section doesn't plane as well as thelighter area and the shavings are crumbly and dry. The strips seem tobend in a U without breaking. Is there a way to determine if the stripsare overheated? Should I take a chance and finish the rod or cut mylosses and begin again? Thanks. Terry Longair from dannyt@frisurf.no Sun Mar 12 15:09:54 2000 Sun, 12 Mar 2000 21:55:28 +0100 (MET) Subject: Re: heat treating RodmakersList On my second rod, I experinced tha same thing, forgot to turn the heatgundown when the oven was ready. Same result, the upper halv of the canewasmuch darker. I also had problem planning it, but took it as aplanningpractice, glued up the splines and tryed the U-bend test. The rodbroke in two, and I noticed a very strange feeling in the cane. It was justlike the fibres slided inside the rod, and the brake had long fibres justlike a brush. Just my experince for what its worth..... danny------>--------work From: "Martin Jensen" Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 12:28:50 -0800 Subject: RE: heat treating I like a destructive test. A test to the death so to speak. Take a"over- heated" strip and an unheated strip from the same culm and bendthemuntil breaking. Do they both feel the same when they break? Don't have aspare spline? Are the splines long enough so that you can sacrifice a bitoff of one end? Start by breaking a bunch of the scrap strips that you(must) have. Breaking them is a really good way to feel the strength ofthebamboo and also so you get the "feel" of what you are working with.If the spline just snaps in half, then it is junk. If it is keep breaking itso that you will get the feel of bad vs. good.If it breaks like the unheated stuff, then go for it and build a rod. If itends up being crap (unlikely but it is possible) you haven't really wastedanything. You have just refined your overall rod building skills. Kind of awin win situation. Again, if it just breaks, I wouldn't bother buildingwithit. I would use it for break testing. This is really important I think.IMHO from my experience, from what you have described, I'm betting thatyourbamboo is good. when you temper the bamboo, it will plane a littleharderand as you have described. Remember, it is not as soft as it once was.Now if you just heat treated a section of 1.5 ft, well you are going tohavesome interesting action there in addition to most likely a noticeablecolordifference. All in all though, I wouldn't let just that one factor stop me from proceeding.Martin Jensen -----Original Message-----From: owner-rodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2000 11:31 AM Subject: heat treating Hi all,Thanks for your recipes for heat treating.Now I have a problem, my heat gun setup didn't work as well aspreviously and over 1 1/2 feet of the strips Max temperatures of 400degrees for 5 - 7 minutes was achieved. The cane over this area turned adarker colour. My problem is, this section doesn't plane as well as thelighter area and the shavings are crumbly and dry. The strips seem tobend in a U without breaking. Is there a way to determine if the stripsare overheated? Should I take a chance and finish the rod or cut mylosses and begin again? Thanks. Terry Longair from richard.nantel@videotron.ca Sun Mar 12 15:43:12 2000 Internet Mail Serversims.3.5.1999.12.14.10.29.p8)with SMTP id forrodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu; Sun, 12 Mar 2000 16:42:33 placement My apologies. I made a couple of typos in the guide placements in myprevious e-mail. Here is the actual placement from Cattanach's Guideprogram for a 6'8" taper: tip top5 1/810 13/161723 5/830 13/1638 1/2 (just above ferrule) 46 5/855 5/16 (stripping guide 24 7/16 from butt) Richard-----Original Message----- Subject: Guide placement I spent a good part of this evening trying to work out a good guideplacement scheme for my F.E. Thomas 6'8" 3 wt taper. The closest ready-madeguide placement I could find was in Garrison's book, for his 6'9" taper.There were two things I didn't like about this placement, however. Thestripping guide was only 22 3/4 inches from the butt a bit close I feel.Also, Garrison uses 9 guides for this this fairly short rod. Jack Howellhas a chart for a 6'6" guide placement in his book that uses one less guideand places the ferrule guide on the tip section rather than the butt.Pretty neat idea but I still needed to do some adjustments for my slightlylonger taper. I then remembered Wayne's Guide program that came on the Hexrod disk.Whata great tool!! Using Wayne's program, I quickly came up with a guideplacement which looks pretty good. Since this rod is quite popular, here isthe guide placement I came up with. Perhaps this will save someone a fewhours work. tip top5 1/810 13/1617233038 1/2 (just above ferrule) 46 5/855 5/16 (stripping guide 24 7/16 from butt) If anyone knows the actual guide placement on this rod, I'd love to knowit. Thanks, Wayne, for a really useful tool. Richard from HomeyDKlown@worldnet.att.net Sun Mar 12 16:01:51 2000 (InterMail vM.4.01.02.31a 201-229-119-114) with ESMTP +0000 Subject: Darkening chromed steel This may have been covered a while ago, but here goes. I have allblackened hardware for a particular rod, all except the tip top, thatis. I need a method for blackening hard chrome on the guide. Is thereanything aside from the pen trick? I did that and it doesn't look toobad (I'll use it if I have to), but I'm sure it's not as durable as achemical corrosion blackening process. Any ideas out there? TIA, Dennis from TSmithwick@aol.com Sun Mar 12 16:57:02 2000 Subject: Re: Darkening chromed steel In a message dated 3/12/0 10:08:10 PM, HomeyDKlown@worldnet.att.netwrites: from LECLAIR123@aol.com Sun Mar 12 16:59:16 2000 Subject: Re: Darkening chromed steel In a message dated 03/12/2000 5:08:10 PM Eastern Standard Time, HomeyDKlown@worldnet.att.net writes: Dennis,There is nothing you can do chemically, todarken hard chrome. Believe me, I've tried them all. Dave LeClair http://hometown.aol.com/leclair123/index.html from HomeyDKlown@worldnet.att.net Sun Mar 12 17:20:26 2000 (InterMail vM.4.01.02.31a 201-229-119-114) with ESMTP ;Sun, 12 Mar 2000 23:19:53 +0000 Subject: Re: Darkening chromed steel Tom, You're absolutely right. I have a bottle of Dave LeClair's Payne sol'nand a bottle of Birchwood Casey's Brass Black and niether of themworked. After they both failed (I kind of expected them to) I had at itwith an old petri dish marker that I "borrowed" from my microbiologydays. It doesn't look all that bad. Next time I'll order more black tip tops. Live and learn... Dennis TSmithwick@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 3/12/0 10:08:10 PM, HomeyDKlown@worldnet.att.netwrites: I am afraid you have a problem. I think you will find the chromeimperviousto any chemical treatment, and paint won't stick well to it either. I havehad good luck with the commercially available black chrome tip tops.They areeven a reasonable match for the old style snake guides. I would suggestyouorder some of them. from nobler@satx.rr.com Sun Mar 12 17:21:41 2000 SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.357.35);Sun, 12 Mar 2000 17:21:53 -0600 Subject: Re: Darkening chromed steel The only way to even get epoxy to stick to chrome, is to etch it withmuratic acid. This acid will remove all the chrome, if left in it very long,but swabbing with it, using a Q-tip, just might work. A black chrome topwould be much better. GMA----- Original Message ----- Subject: Re: Darkening chromed steel In a message dated 3/12/0 10:08:10 PM, HomeyDKlown@worldnet.att.netwrites: I am afraid you have a problem. I think you will find the chromeimperviousto any chemical treatment, and paint won't stick well to it either. I havehad good luck with the commercially available black chrome tip tops.Theyareeven a reasonable match for the old style snake guides. I would suggestyouorder some of them. from djfinch@sprintmail.com Mon Mar 13 08:22:33 2000 Subject: test delete now from dickay@alltel.net Mon Mar 13 10:34:10 2000 KAA09727 Subject: Test boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF8CD6.BAE7B2E0" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF8CD6.BAE7B2E0 Am I on? It seems awfully quite! ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF8CD6.BAE7B2E0 ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01BF8CD6.BAE7B2E0-- from mcanultj@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu Mon Mar 13 10:47:15 2000 Mon, 13 Mar 2000 10:44:39 -0600 R8.30.00.7) Subject: Unbinding the bound (Nyatex and thread removal) A while back someone posted about removing the binding thread from a Nyatex glued section and then rebinding the section. Wayne subsequently posted that he had tried it and it worked great. I saved those posts, took them home for my notebook and SHMBO tossed it outat some point (can't find it in the archives). So, I just tried this- glued up a butt section with Nyatex and pulled off the thread about 16 hours later and rebound it to be heat tempered later. The question is- Is this the best time to pull the thread or should I do it either earlier or later after gluing? The thread came off OK with a little resistance, I'm just not sure how the tip will respond to the same handling. Anyone know what the optimal way to approach this in the Nyatex glued section is?Thanks for any info.Jon McAnulty from yves@dancris.com Mon Mar 13 12:33:58 2000 [208.201.203.128] (may be forged)) Subject: Binding List: I recall reading a posting from Dave LeClair that mentioned bindingglued up rods without a binder. I believe that there was also somethingabout using an old Penn bait casting reel for tensioning. Has anyone gotsome tips about using this procedure - any "pitfalls"? Dave - do you stilldo it this way? Thanks, Dave LaT. from fbcwin@3g.quik.com Mon Mar 13 14:47:27 2000 Mon, 13 Mar 2000 12:47:19 -0800 Subject: Re: Unbinding the bound (Nyatex and thread removal) mcanultj@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu wrote: I'm just not sure how the tip will respond to the samehandling. Anyone know what the optimal way to approach this in theNyatex glued section is?Thanks for any info.Jon McAnulty Jon,I think Richard Tyree made the original post, and I may have followedup on it. If the times you tried worked, then stick with them. As soon as Ibind the blank, I wash it down with white vinegar. Doing so removes about80%of the excess glue. The next day (8-16 hours) I remove the originalbindingcord, and carefully wash down the bare blank with vinegar again. Thissecondwashing removes almost all the remaining excess glue. I then re- bind, andheatset the glue.I don't know that this is the "optimal way to approach this" as youwrote, but it is a good way. Be careful with the glued blank during thesecondwashing and binding, and you should be okay. Harry--Harry Boydhttp://HarryBoydbamboorods.eboard.com/ from saltwein@swbell.net Mon Mar 13 16:41:02 2000 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.09.16.21.57.p8)with ESMTP id for Subject: Franken tools I have been planing to make a drying/drawing booth, to put a drawn polyfinish on my strips and dry them. I have several notebooks full of plansand three or four materials list. Today, inspired by the Franktool posts, I made one from cardboard,viscuine, duct tape, and a one foot square of luan paneling. It workslike a charm, is light as a feather and breaks down. All materials wereon hand. Regards, SteveIndependence, MO from saltwein@swbell.net Mon Mar 13 16:52:35 2000 (Sun Internet Mail Server sims.3.5.1999.09.16.21.57.p8)with ESMTP id for Subject: Chan Bamboo Report I received my shipment of bamboo from Cary Chan today. This will make the fourth source for some 24 sticks of bamboo that Ihave purchased. I mention this to give some background to my report;least some imagine I have much more experience. The ten culms are a golden brown color, and straight with no evidence ofscorching to straighten. Several culms have a few leaf node areas andthere is the normal scarring and water marks. No growers marks. The culms are between 1-7/8 inch to 2-1/2 inches, with most falling inthe two inch range. They have good heft and power fiber with no visiblesign of worm damage or mold. Of the ten culms only two had any randomsplitting, and it was minimal. Viewing the ten culms, laid out on a workbench, after putting the dryingsplit in them, brought a huge smile to my face. This compares favorablywith any cane I have bought and I wouldn't mind having the rafters fullof it. Still looking for that exceptional, flawless culm. Regards, SteveIndependence, MO from HomeyDKlown@worldnet.att.net Mon Mar 13 17:47:53 2000 (InterMail vM.4.01.02.31a 201-229-119-114) with ESMTP ;Mon, 13 Mar 2000 23:47:20 +0000 "rodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu" Subject: Re: Unbinding the bound (Nyatex and thread removal) Jon, I glue with Epon. After the glue is set (~24 hours) I just pull thestring off. It comes off in a single strand. Then I sand the glueresidue off with a sanding block loaded with 220 grit wet/dry paper. Iwould suggest sanding the string and excess glue off with the block ifyou can't just pull it off. Dennis mcanultj@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu wrote: A while back someone posted about removing the binding thread fromaNyatex glued section and then rebinding the section. Waynesubsequently posted that he had tried it and it worked great. I savedthose posts, took them home for my notebook and SHMBO tossed it outatsome point (can't find it in the archives). So, I just tried this-glued up a butt section with Nyatex and pulled off the thread about 16hours later and rebound it to be heat tempered later. The question is-Is this the best time to pull the thread or should I do it eitherearlier or later after gluing? The thread came off OK with a littleresistance, I'm just not sure how the tip will respond to the samehandling. Anyone know what the optimal way to approach this in theNyatex glued section is?Thanks for any info.Jon McAnulty from lblove@cableone.net Mon Mar 13 19:23:35 2000 Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.117.11);Mon, 13 Mar 2000 18:22:51 -0700 Subject: 4' 4" banty rod boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000A_01BF8D21.158D9260" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01BF8D21.158D9260 Should I put a #8 stripping guide on a 4'4" 4 wt. rod(which should =throw 5 wt. do to .003 oversize) on this rod, or should I use a large =snake guide as the Hardy Banty's had? This is not a rod of beauty as =this is my first rod that will be finished and will more than likely be =used for "perch jerkin" over the next few months. Also would a 5" long =handle be about right? Any smaller and my hand will not fit on the =grip. Brad ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01BF8D21.158D9260 Hello guy, guide = 4 wt. rod(which should throw 5 wt. do to .003 oversize) on this rod, or = beauty as this is my first rod that will be finished and will more than = grip. TIA Brad ------=_NextPart_000_000A_01BF8D21.158D9260-- from dickay@alltel.net Mon Mar 13 19:26:37 2000 TAA11863; Subject: Re: Unbinding the bound (Nyatex and thread removal) Jon, Are these the posts that you are talking about. from Jerry Foster 1/26/98 4:42 PM Tom, I think several of us are using Nyatex, but the issue can get awfullypolitical if it wasn't specifically tested.. by the way, I've found that ifI re-roll (?) the glued blanks on fresh paper about and hr. or so aftergluing, I can unwrap the binding thread 24/4 at the 16 hr mark whout muchproblem, makes sanding a little easier, don't have to file.RegardsJerry from Wayne Cattanach 1/26/98 5:14 PM Tom - Yes there are many makers using Nyatex glue - If you missed itthereis now a method of rebinding the glued strips at 16-24 hour air drying(temperature dependant) - before thermo steeing - this allows the threadbeing removed after heat curing and solves the need to file or sand thethread off. Hope that this helps. I save some of these for future reference too. Dick Fuhrman----- Original Message ----- Subject: Unbinding the bound (Nyatex and thread removal) A while back someone posted about removing the binding thread fromaNyatex glued section and then rebinding the section. Waynesubsequently posted that he had tried it and it worked great. I savedthose posts, took them home for my notebook and SHMBO tossed it outatsome point (can't find it in the archives). So, I just tried this-glued up a butt section with Nyatex and pulled off the thread about16hours later and rebound it to be heat tempered later. The questionis-Is this the best time to pull the thread or should I do it eitherearlier or later after gluing? The thread came off OK with a littleresistance, I'm just not sure how the tip will respond to the samehandling. Anyone know what the optimal way to approach this in theNyatex glued section is?Thanks for any info.Jon McAnulty from tonkin@xtn.net Mon Mar 13 19:32:37 2000 Subject: Watauga River Tragedy Please excuse the non rod message here but, I thought as fisherman,y'all might want to know about this recent tragedy that has befallen theWatauga River here in East Tennessee.On Feb. 25th a fire at the North American Rayon Plant in Elizabethton,TN has allegedly contributed to a massive fishkill on the greattailwater known as the Watuga River! It is estimated that 34,000 troutwere killed as a result of the fire. A Tennessee Wildlife ResourcesAgency trout biologist as stated that "The Watauga River below the NARplant is somewhere between completely dead and almost dead."It is tragic that such a great river has been delivered such a knock outpunch!-- --- --------------------------------------------------Click here for Free Video!!http://www.gohip.com/freevideo/ from cattanac@wmis.net Mon Mar 13 22:49:40 2000 mail4.wmis.net (8.8.8/SCO5) with SMTP idXAA28958 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 23:49:37 Subject: Re: Unbinding the bound (Nyatex and thread removal) The History -well I suspect that I am the one that can take the blame for the Nyatexglue - I saw it originally used to glue the flocking in the window rails forthe auto industry - My good friend used it in his plastic plant. the processis a continuous run situation - from the plastics extruder the warmplasticis sprayed on the track and then the flocking is applied and stood on endwith a High voltage DC field and then the glue is dried in a 75 foot lighttunnel that is about 325 degrees. The glue will stay uncured for an 8 hourshift in the mixing pot but is complete dried at the end of the lighttunnel. I thought it would be worth a try for rods - that was some 15yearsago.The down fall of using the glue is that you must think throw away withevery thing it comes in comtact with - or most everything - and for yearsIwould leave the original binding thread in place when the glue was heatset.Believe me it was not a fun job filing the thread from delicate tipsections. Then a couple of years ago Al Medved hinted that he didn't havethat problem - and when I quizzed him further - he said he was completelyremoving the binding thread before the thermal setting. But he allowed afull 24 hours of air drying before he thermal set the rod.Well - I gave it a try during a rod making clas one time - but onlyallowed the rod section to air dry for 12 hours before removing thebindingthread - NOT a pretty story - so a compromise was devised - at the end of16hours air the original binding thread was removed and fresh threadapplied.After the sections were heat treated the fresh thread zipped right off andsurface cleaning was a snap copmpared to before - So if there is thanks tobe handed out here - it should go to Al -And another little trick which isn't directly related but close is theuse of a Bic lighter to retouch flamed areas that get too light. The flameof the lighter isn't used to reflame the surface - but instead the flamed isdampened with the rod section to cause it to deposit soot on the surfacewhich can be spread with the fing to blend it into the tone that is desired.To cause the flame to damped - place the surface of the rod section intotheflame about half way up the flame - it will stop the plune effect of theflame from drawing oxygen for combustion and leaves a sooty deposit. from fbcwin@3g.quik.com Mon Mar 13 23:16:25 2000 Mon, 13 Mar 2000 21:16:18 -0800 Subject: Re: Unbinding the bound (Nyatex and thread removal) Thanks Wayne. I guess I didn't remember who first mentionedremovingthe string then rebinding before heat setting. I should have suspected you. Harry Wayne Cattanach wrote: The History -well I suspect that I am the one that can take the blame for theNyatexglue - I saw it originally used to glue the flocking in the window railsforthe auto industry - My good friend used it in his plastic plant. theprocessis a continuous run situation - from the plastics extruder the warmplasticis sprayed on the track and then the flocking is applied and stood on endwith a High voltage DC field and then the glue is dried in a 75 foot lighttunnel that is about 325 degrees. The glue will stay uncured for an 8hourshift in the mixing pot but is complete dried at the end of the lighttunnel. I thought it would be worth a try for rods - that was some 15yearsago.The down fall of using the glue is that you must think throw awaywithevery thing it comes in comtact with - or most everything - and foryears Iwould leave the original binding thread in place when the glue was heatset.Believe me it was not a fun job filing the thread from delicate tipsections. Then a couple of years ago Al Medved hinted that he didn't havethat problem - and when I quizzed him further - he said he wascompletelyremoving the binding thread before the thermal setting. But he allowed afull 24 hours of air drying before he thermal set the rod.Well - I gave it a try during a rod making clas one time - but onlyallowed the rod section to air dry for 12 hours before removing thebindingthread - NOT a pretty story - so a compromise was devised - at the endof 16hours air the original binding thread was removed and fresh threadapplied.After the sections were heat treated the fresh thread zipped right offandsurface cleaning was a snap copmpared to before - So if there is thankstobe handed out here - it should go to Al -And another little trick which isn't directly related but close is theuse of a Bic lighter to retouch flamed areas that get too light. The flameof the lighter isn't used to reflame the surface - but instead the flamedisdampened with the rod section to cause it to deposit soot on the surfacewhich can be spread with the fing to blend it into the tone that isdesired.To cause the flame to damped - place the surface of the rod section intotheflame about half way up the flame - it will stop the plune effect of theflame from drawing oxygen for combustion and leaves a sooty deposit. --Harry Boydhttp://HarryBoydbamboorods.eboard.com/ from horsesho@ptd.net Tue Mar 14 05:14:21 2000 0000 (204.186.33.18) Subject: Re: 4' 4" banty rod Bradley Love wrote: Hello guy,Should I put a #8 stripping guide on a 4'4" 4 wt. rod(which shouldthrow 5 wt. do to .003 oversize) on this rod, or should I use a largesnake guide as the Hardy Banty's had? This is not a rod of beauty asthis is my first rod that will be finished and will more than likelybe used for "perch jerkin" over the next few months. Also would a 5"long handle be about right? Any smaller and my hand will not fit onthe grip. TIABradIf it will throw a #5 I would put a #8 stripper preferrably carbide ora chrome plated casting guide. Also I believe the old attage "little rodlittle grip". 41/2" grip will look much better than a 5". It may feelsmall at first but you will get used to it. I have some old orvis rodsthat have 4" grips. Marty from danny.twang@porsgrunnsdagblad.no Tue Mar 14 05:57:51 2000 (HELO localhost) Tue, 14 Mar 2000 12:56:06 +0100 munin.funn.no(Data Fellows SMTPRS 2.04) with ESMTP id;Tue, 14 Mar 2000 12:57:28 +0100 Subject: Unwanted moisture To all.... I have a un varnished blank, that have been in my workshop for a coupleof months.Today I had a look at it, and when I bend the rod, its staying bend`ed.Is this because the bamboo has taken moisture from the environment? Is it possible to put it in the heater again, and get rid of theunwanted moisture? The rod has been glued with PU, it can take about100*C without any problem. Or is the rod only suitable for a blackboardpointer....... TIAdanny from richard.nantel@videotron.ca Tue Mar 14 07:20:52 2000 Internet Mail Serversims.3.5.1999.12.14.10.29.p8)with SMTP id forrodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:16:57 Subject: RE: Unwanted moisture If I recall, in recent discussions about finishing rods, a few list memberscame to the conclusion that the type of finish or whether the rod isfinished at all doesn't make any difference to its ability to excludemoisture. And yet we continue to hear stories such as this one, where thecane has obviously become full of humidity. How do we explain this? Richard -----Original Message-----From: owner-rodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 7:06 AM Subject: Unwanted moisture To all.... I have a un varnished blank, that have been in my workshop of months.Today I had a look at it, and when I bend the rod, itsstaying bend`ed.Is this because the bamboo has taken moisture from the environment? Is it possible to put it in the heater again, and get rid of theunwanted moisture? The rod has been glued with PU, it can take about100*C without any problem. Or is the rod only suitable for ablackboardpointer....... TIAdanny from danny.twang@porsgrunnsdagblad.no Tue Mar 14 07:39:51 2000 (HELO localhost) Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:38:19 +0100 munin.funn.no(Data Fellows SMTPRS 2.04) with ESMTP id;Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:39:44 +0100 "rodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu" Subject: Re: Unwanted moisture No question about it, this got to affect the cane. The blank had crisp actionwhen i put it away.My workshop is constant heated to 20-24*C, its in my basement though,but itsdry like the rest of my house. regardsdanny Richard Nantel wrote: If I recall, in recent discussions about finishing rods, a few listmemberscame to the conclusion that the type of finish or whether the rod isfinished at all doesn't make any difference to its ability to excludemoisture. And yet we continue to hear stories such as this one, wherethecane has obviously become full of humidity. How do we explain this? Richard -----Original Message-----From: owner-rodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 7:06 AM Subject: Unwanted moisture To all.... I have a un varnished blank, that have been in my workshop of months.Today I had a look at it, and when I bend the rod, itsstaying bend`ed.Is this because the bamboo has taken moisture from the environment? Is it possible to put it in the heater again, and get rid of theunwanted moisture? The rod has been glued with PU, it can take about100*C without any problem. Or is the rod only suitable for ablackboardpointer....... TIAdanny from richard.nantel@videotron.ca Tue Mar 14 07:51:12 2000 Internet Mail Serversims.3.5.1999.12.14.10.29.p8)with SMTP id forrodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 08:41:00 Subject: RE: Unwanted moisture rodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu Frankly, Danny, I suspect finish matters a lot which is why I nowimpregnate my rods. Richard -----Original Message----- Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 8:49 AM Subject: Re: Unwanted moisture No question about it, this got to affect the cane. The blankhad crisp actionwhen i put it away.My workshop is constant heated to 20-24*C, its in my basementthough, but itsdry like the rest of my house. regardsdanny Richard Nantel wrote: If I recall, in recent discussions about finishing rods, afew list memberscame to the conclusion that the type of finish or whether the rod isfinished at all doesn't make any difference to its abilityto excludemoisture. And yet we continue to hear stories such as thisone, where thecane has obviously become full of humidity. How do we explain this? Richard -----Original Message-----From: owner-rodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu TwangSent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 7:06 AM Subject: Unwanted moisture To all.... I have a un varnished blank, that have been in my workshop of months.Today I had a look at it, and when I bend the rod, itsstaying bend`ed.Is this because the bamboo has taken moisture from theenvironment? Is it possible to put it in the heater again, and get rid of theunwanted moisture? The rod has been glued with PU, it cantake about100*C without any problem. Or is the rod only suitable for ablackboardpointer....... TIAdanny from mschaffer@mindspring.com Tue Mar 14 08:18:26 2000 Subject: Explaination of stress curves wanted boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF8D95.C2B8D5C0" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF8D95.C2B8D5C0 Guys,Does anyone know of a site where I could read a good explaination of =stress curves that is written for the non-engineer? Thanks, Mike ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF8D95.C2B8D5C0 Guys,Does anyone know of a site where I = non-engineer? Thanks, Mike ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01BF8D95.C2B8D5C0-- from TSmithwick@aol.com Tue Mar 14 08:20:38 2000 Subject: Re: RE: Unwanted moisture rodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu In a message dated 3/14/0 1:26:09 PM, richard.nantel@videotron.cawrites: Richard - I think you may have misunderstood what people were saying. No finish on a rod would be a disaster. It would allow the cane to easily exchange moisture with the air, and in the typical temperate zone climate where most of us live, you would have a big humidity spike in the summer,and a drying effect in the heated indoor air of winter. No finish will stop the moisture exchange, but any reasonable one will slow the process enough to eliminate the seasonal spikes and give you a moisture content reasonably close to the average for your climate. The good news for Danny is that moisture is not fatal, and if he puts the rod in a drying cabinet, he is back in business. I suspect his basement is the culprit. My own rods are always stored in a heated space in winter, and air conditioned in summer.To give you an idea of how much moisture can be reabsorbed and thendriven off, I once straightened flamed strips by the Bokstrom soaking method.The strips became so pliable, I believe I could have tied them in a knot. Amonth later I glued up the rod, never having done anything special to dry the strips. The rod is an ultra crisp caster, that has never taken a set.Another thought for Danny. If your basement is indeed dry, you may nothave enough heat treatment into the strips. If that is the case, even areasonable moisture content may be enough to allow the rod to take a set. I wouldstill build the rod. A couple of my early rods are probably in that category, but still fish well from danny.twang@porsgrunnsdagblad.no Tue Mar 14 08:37:43 2000 (HELO localhost) Tue, 14 Mar 2000 15:36:01 +0100 munin.funn.no(Data Fellows SMTPRS 2.04) with ESMTP id;Tue, 14 Mar 2000 15:37:18 +0100 "rodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu" Subject: Re: Unwanted moisture Tom, The cane was heat treated to a medium brown color, airflow oven 180*C minutes, and the flamed to get the dark brown stripes. So I think it wastreatedall right, but maybe the environment is more humid than I want to think...... danny TSmithwick@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 3/14/0 1:26:09 PM, richard.nantel@videotron.cawrites: Richard - I think you may have misunderstood what people were saying.Nofinish on a rod would be a disaster. It would allow the cane to easilyexchange moisture with the air, and in the typical temperate zoneclimatewhere most of us live, you would have a big humidity spike in thesummer, anda drying effect in the heated indoor air of winter. No finish will stop themoisture exchange, but any reasonable one will slow the process enoughtoeliminate the seasonal spikes and give you a moisture contentreasonablyclose to the average for your climate. The good news for Danny is thatmoisture is not fatal, and if he puts the rod in a drying cabinet, he isbackin business. I suspect his basement is the culprit. My own rods arealwaysstored in a heated space in winter, and air conditioned in summer.To give you an idea of how much moisture can be reabsorbed and thendrivenoff, I once straightened flamed strips by the Bokstrom soaking method.Thestrips became so pliable, I believe I could have tied them in a knot. Amonthlater I glued up the rod, never having done anything special to dry thestrips. The rod is an ultra crisp caster, that has never taken a set.Another thought for Danny. If your basement is indeed dry, you may nothaveenough heat treatment into the strips. If that is the case, even areasonablemoisture content may be enough to allow the rod to take a set. I wouldstillbuild the rod. A couple of my early rods are probably in that category, butstill fish well from KlingB@health.missouri.edu Tue Mar 14 09:07:05 2000 "'danny.twang@porsgrunnsdagblad.no '","'rodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu '" Subject: RE: Unwanted moisture Richard -- How do you know the problem is just moisture? If that were the case,everyrod with tung oil finish (I'd say all rods, but I think most agree that thiswould be true for tung-oiled rods) should exhibit the same behavior inmoistenvironments -- which they do not. Neither do all unvarnished blanks thatsit around a while, even in rainy weather here in Missouri -- I can attestto that. Moisture might be a factor (for example, if the rod is notadequately heat treated) but there are obviously other factors andwaterproof varnish is apparently not a decisive one. I'm not saying I KNOWthe explanation -- but not knowing is where we're at. It's better to realizethat than to hold onto explanations that clearly don't explain what we see. I guess I should mention why I care about this. It think it's excellent todo something because it's traditional and feels/looks right -- and thatshould be enough. But when a technical explanation is added to apreferenceof that sort, the implication is that those failing to use the advocatedmethod are poorer craftspeople. On technical (rather than aesthetic orhistoric) matters I feel it's better to be clear about what we know andwhatwe don't. There's a lot we don't. Thanks for the therapy, I feel better now.... Barry -----Original Message----- Subject: RE: Unwanted moisture If I recall, in recent discussions about finishing rods, a few listmemberscame to the conclusion that the type of finish or whether the rod isfinished at all doesn't make any difference to its ability to excludemoisture. And yet we continue to hear stories such as this one, wherethecane has obviously become full of humidity. How do we explain this? Richard -----Original Message-----From: owner-rodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 7:06 AM Subject: Unwanted moisture To all.... I have a un varnished blank, that have been in my workshop of months.Today I had a look at it, and when I bend the rod, itsstaying bend`ed.Is this because the bamboo has taken moisture from the environment? Is it possible to put it in the heater again, and get rid of theunwanted moisture? The rod has been glued with PU, it can take about100*C without any problem. Or is the rod only suitable for ablackboardpointer....... TIAdanny from FlyfishT@aol.com Tue Mar 14 09:07:18 2000 Subject: Re: Re: Unwanted moisture Danny, I had this problem with my third rod, I believe anyway. I was using URAC glue. I just stripped the varnish and reheated at 375F. I had no problemwith glue failure.TOM from fbcwin@3g.quik.com Tue Mar 14 09:23:52 2000 Tue, 14 Mar 2000 07:23:43 -0800 Subject: Re: Explaination of stress curves wanted boundary="------------B389A82789117DC6C59D5A32" --------------B389A82789117DC6C59D5A32 michael wrote: Guys,Does anyone know of a site where I could read a good explainationof stress curves that is written for the non-engineer? Thanks, Mike,The following explanation was written by Darryl Hayashida and postedto the list a few years ago. It has helped me and many others. I'msure Darryl won't mind me re-posting it to the list. Harry----------------In it's most basic use a stress curve shows you how closea split cane rod is to breaking with the weight and lengthof line you specified. Garrison believed 200,000 ouncesper square inch was a good, safe upper level. In realityyou can go up to 220,000 or 230,000 without any problems.Garrison himself went up to 220,000 on his lighter rods.Garrison believed that below the 140,000 point the bamboostopped flexing. As you get deeper into stress curves you can begin to pick out certaincharacteristics that tell you what kind of action the rod has, or willhaveif it hasn't been made yet. A Garrison rod, which I consider to be slow, has a well rounded "hump" near the tip and a fairly slow drop off as itgoes towards the handle. Let's see if I can do this with ASCII art. || * *| * * *| * * *| * * *| * **| *| *| *| *| *_*______________________________________________ The rod that I'm always raving about, the Cattanach 7' 0"4 wt, I consider to be fairly fast. It has a stress curve like this: || *| * *| * *| * *| * *| * * *| * * * *** *| *| *| *_*______________________________________________ The blip near the handle is the Cattanach hinge, and it greatlyenhances roll casting. Don't forget to put it in. I did and the rodI made was a terrible roll caster. It isn't as necessary on longerrods, but on shorter rods it's definitely needed. A Paul Young Para 15, what is described as a parabolic actionlooks like this: || * * * *| * * * *| * * * *| * * * *| * * * *| *| *| *| *| *_*______________________________________________ Looking at this rod, and never having cast one, I would guessthat it would feel fairly slow, due to the enhanced bending nearthe handle, but able to throw a lot of line, due to the stiff midsection. I would also guess that it could roll cast really well. There are as many variations of stress curves as there arerodmakers. This covers the slow, fast and parabolic actions. Sir Darryl --------------B389A82789117DC6C59D5A32 michael wrote:Guys,Doesanyone know of a site where I could read a good explaination of stress Mike, list.Harry----------------In it's most basic use a stress curve shows you how closea split cane rod is to breaking with the weight and lengthof line you specified. Garrison believed 200,000 ouncesper square inch was a good, safe upper level. In realityyou can go up to 220,000 or 230,000 without any problems.Garrison himself went up to 220,000 on his lighter rods.Garrison believed that below the 140,000 point the bamboostopped flexing.As you get deeper into stress curves you can beginto pick out certaincharacteristics that tell you what kind of action the rod has, or willhaveif it hasn't been made yet. A Garrison rod, which I consider to beslow,has a well rounded "hump" near the tip and a fairly slow drop off asitgoes towards the handle. Let's see if I can do this with ASCII art.| * _*______________________________________________ The rod that I'm always raving about, the Cattanach 7' 0"4 wt, I consider to be fairly fast. It has a stress curve like this:| * * * * * * * _*______________________________________________ The blip near the handle is the Cattanach hinge, and it greatly rodI made was a terrible roll caster. It isn't as necessary on longerrods, but on shorter rods it's definitely needed.A Paul Young Para 15, what is described as a parabolic actionlooks like this:| * * * _*______________________________________________ Looking at this rod, and never having cast one, I would guessthat it would feel fairly slow, due to the enhanced bending nearthe handle, but able to throw a lot of line, due to the stiff midsection. I would also guess that it could roll cast really well.There are as many variations of stress curves as there arerodmakers. This covers the slow, fast and parabolic actions.Sir Darryl --------------B389A82789117DC6C59D5A32-- from fbcwin@3g.quik.com Tue Mar 14 09:41:54 2000 Tue, 14 Mar 2000 07:41:48 -0800 rodmakers@wugate.wustl.eduSubject: Addditional Alaska Trip information Friends,A few weeks ago I asked for advice on an Alaska trip this summer.Several of you, notably Jim McGrath and Dave Barron and others, were ofmuch help. Our plans have firmed up, and I need a little more specifichelp.We arrive in Anchorage on July 3, and fly out the next day for 4days of fishing on the Talachulitna River. There we expect to catchKings, Rainbows, and Grayling. We return to Anchorage on July 7, wherewe pick up the third member of our party.We have rented an RV for the next seven days and plan to makeour way down the Kenai Peninsula. That's where I need some advice.What fishing should we be sure to include in the Kenai leg of our trip?We think we would like to catch fish other than Kings on this part ofthe trip? What towns should we visit? Which River(s)? should we fish?Are there areas that are closed to specific types of fishing during thattime? What species can we look for? Should we hire guides, and if so,would you make recommendations? Are there specific campgrounds weshould stay in or avoid? And the list of questions goes on an on.To those of you on the Rodmakers list, I apologize for the non-rodmaking specific tenor of this post. Having the collective wisdom ofthese lists available is priceless. Thanks in advance for all yourhelp. Harry Boyd --Harry Boydhttp://HarryBoydbamboorods.eboard.com/ from cmj@post11.tele.dk Tue Mar 14 10:44:29 2000 (InterMail vM.4.01.02.00 201-229-116) with SMTP +0100 Subject: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Georg__Maurer=B4s_e-mail_address?= Anyone have an e-mail address for Georg Maurer?Please respond off-line George, if You are there, please write me. Carsten Jorgensen cmj@post11.tele.dk from Fallcreek9@aol.com Tue Mar 14 11:08:15 2000 Subject: Fwd: Unbinding the bound (Nyatex and thread removal) boundary="part1_6e.1531f4d.25ffcbdc_boundary" --part1_6e.1531f4d.25ffcbdc_boundary In a message dated 3/13/00 2:48:34 PM Central Standard Time, fbcwin@3g.quik.com writes: Harry: Nope, wasn't me. As far as I knew, Wayne originated the idea. Those Nyatex fumes getting to you? :>) Best, Richard --part1_6e.1531f4d.25ffcbdc_boundary 15:48:34 -0500 rly-za05.mx.aol.com (v69.17) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:48:14-0500 Mon, 13 Mar 2000 12:47:19 -0800 Subject: Re: Unbinding the bound (Nyatex and thread removal) mcanultj@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu wrote: I'm just not sure how the tip will respond to the samehandling. Anyone know what the optimal way to approach this in theNyatex glued section is?Thanks for any info.Jon McAnulty Jon,I think Richard Tyree made the original post, and I may have followedup on it. If the times you tried worked, then stick with them. As soon as Ibind the blank, I wash it down with white vinegar. Doing so removes about80%of the excess glue. The next day (8-16 hours) I remove the originalbindingcord, and carefully wash down the bare blank with vinegar again. Thissecondwashing removes almost all the remaining excess glue. I then re- bind, andheatset the glue.I don't know that this is the "optimal way to approach this" as youwrote, but it is a good way. Be careful with the glued blank during thesecondwashing and binding, and you should be okay. Harry--Harry Boydhttp://HarryBoydbamboorods.eboard.com/ --part1_6e.1531f4d.25ffcbdc_boundary-- from mcanultj@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu Tue Mar 14 11:38:21 2000 Tue, 14 Mar 2000 11:35:50 -0600 R8.30.00.7) Subject: Sean Maran's splitting method --simple boundary A while back Richard Nantel posted a method of splitting that Sean Maranhad showed him. Well, I finally used up the shards, splinters, wedges andwhatnot that were the result of my first splitting attempts and needed to split anew culm. I used Sean's technique and the results were an incredibleimprovement over using the knife freehand. After perfectly splitting the first quarterculm marks on every node at 0.20 inch intervals around the circumference of the culm(tip section culm). I was able to hit almost every pencil mark dead-on with the advancing split. It was like shooting targets. In some pieces as I split Iendedup with 3 strips so I could not split it in half as described. However, itwas easy if I held the thicker strip with my other fingers and extended theindex finger further down on the thick strip to gain some leverage. This allowedme tobend both strips (the thick and thin one) to the same amount of deflectioneven though the thick strip was much stiffer and still drive the split to eithersideas needed.Anyway, I thought I'd post this experience and say thanks, splitting is no longer the stuff of nightmares for me. ;-)Jon --simple boundary 15:48:34 -0500 rly-za05.mx.aol.com (v69.17) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Mar 2000 15:48:14-0500 Mon, 13 Mar 2000 12:47:19 -0800 Subject: Re: Unbinding the bound (Nyatex and thread removal) mcanultj@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu wrote: I'm just not sure how the tip will respond to the samehandling. Anyone know what the optimal way to approach this in theNyatex glued section is?Thanks for any info.Jon McAnulty Jon,I think Richard Tyree made the original post, and I may have followedup on it. If the times you tried worked, then stick with them. As soon as Ibind the blank, I wash it down with white vinegar. Doing so removes about80%of the excess glue. The next day (8-16 hours) I remove the originalbindingcord, and carefully wash down the bare blank with vinegar again. Thissecondwashing removes almost all the remaining excess glue. I then re- bind, andheatset the glue.I don't know that this is the "optimal way to approach this" as youwrote, but it is a good way. Be careful with the glued blank during thesecondwashing and binding, and you should be okay. Harry--Harry Boydhttp://HarryBoydbamboorods.eboard.com/ --simple boundary-- from mcanultj@svm.vetmed.wisc.edu Tue Mar 14 13:15:08 2000 Tue, 14 Mar 2000 13:12:36 -0600 R8.30.00.7) Subject: Re[2]: Unbinding the bound (Nyatex and thread removal) Harry,Just to be sure I understand you- are you saying you are able to take off the excess Nyatex with the vinegar or are you using some other adhesive?Cheers.Jon from Oozakgpt@aol.com Tue Mar 14 14:33:49 2000 Subject: Where to find shoulder bolts Having a hard time finding shoulder bolts for my planing forms.Cananybody help? from caneman@clnk.com Tue Mar 14 14:46:38 2000 (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-61365U2500L250S0V35)with SMTP id com; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 14:43:23 -0600 Subject: Re: Where to find shoulder bolts Most hardware stores have them. If noone in your area carries them thentryEnco at 1-800-USE-ENCO. I got a sales flyer from them in the mail todaythat has a fairly wide selection of shoulder bolts in it. On the same pagethey have the precision ground dowel pins (almost like a form builderspage*S*)Later,Bob-----Original Message----- Subject: Where to find shoulder bolts Having a hard time finding shoulder bolts for my planing forms.Cananybodyhelp? from rsgould@cmc.net Tue Mar 14 14:47:04 2000 Subject: Re: Unwanted moisture Hi Danny,After reading your posting I feel obligated to tell this true story. Just afew years ago a friend of mine went on a back packing trip with his familyin the wilds of British Columbia armed with a bamboo fly rod I had madeforhim in 1980. It was an 8ft x 2pc x 6wt glued up with Urac 185 andfinishedwith Varmor R-10 varnish. During the hike into the lake where they wouldcamp for 3 days the rod slipped out of it's rod case unbeknownst to themandfell into a small stream they had forded. When they hiked out 3 days laterthey found the rod and brought it to me to "fix" since it had been laying inthe water all that time. You talk about absorbing water, this rod sure hadits opportunity. What I did with the rod was to put it in my rod dryer forseveral days at 100F and then polished up the cork, polished up the varnisha bit and recoated it with one coat of Varmor R-10. The rod was fine. Itretained it's action, remained straight and is still in service today.I'm not sure this will help you solve the dilemma you have with your rodblank but it does point out to me the moisture resisting qualities of a goodvarnish.Ray---- - Original Message ----- Subject: Unwanted moisture To all.... I have a un varnished blank, that have been in my workshop for a coupleof months.Today I had a look at it, and when I bend the rod, its staying bend`ed.Is this because the bamboo has taken moisture from the environment? Is it possible to put it in the heater again, and get rid of theunwanted moisture? The rod has been glued with PU, it can take about100*C without any problem. Or is the rod only suitable for a blackboardpointer....... TIAdanny from mcdowellc@lanecc.edu Tue Mar 14 15:12:03 2000 13:14:45 PST Subject: Humidity vs. Water Water in solid form, ice, wouldn't penetrate a bamboo rod finish, so iswater in liquid form also less able to penetrate a good bamboo rod finish then water in vapor form? If this is true then it would help explain why wewant some kind of finish on our rods to better protect them from liquid watereven if water in vapor form is able to eventually penetrate to some particular level over time. Chris from dannyt@frisurf.no Tue Mar 14 16:17:08 2000 (MET) Subject: Re: Unwanted moisture Thanks folks for all Your help on this issue. I put the rod in my airflow oven for 15 minutes, and its back in business.I'm getting my varnish ready now:-) danny ------>--------work from TSmithwick@aol.com Tue Mar 14 16:25:53 2000 Subject: Re: Unwanted moisture In a message dated 3/14/0 2:39:14 PM, danny.twang@porsgrunnsdagblad.nowrites: That should be enough heat treatment. If the stuff was crisp and is nowlimp, moisture must be the culprit. If you have access to an accurate scale, carefully weigh the sections. Then go to a drying regimen, when you aredone weigh the strips again. If they are lighter, the missing weight is water,and you can figure out what percent moisture you drove out. I use a reloader's grain scale for this purpose. You might also try weighing an extra strip after you heat treat it, and then weigh it every week for a couple months.It is interesting to watch the water return. from rcurry@webryders.com Tue Mar 14 16:46:14 2000 mamabear.webryders.net(Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 593- 58620U1000L100S0V35)with ESMTP id net; Tue, 14 Mar 2000 17:49:30 - 0500 "rodmakers@wugate.wustl.edu" Subject: Re: Unwanted moisture Danny,I've seen this happen to glued sections that had been fine in a workshop years and were then set standing butt down on the concrete floor for twomonths.They would hold any bend. Some careful drying and they were crisp again.Methinks the cane wicks moisture from the concrete.Best regards,Reed Danny Twang wrote: Tom, The cane was heat treated to a medium brown color, airflow oven 180*C minutes, and the flamed to get the dark brown stripes. So I think it wastreatedall right, but maybe the environment is more humid than I want tothink...... danny TSmithwick@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 3/14/0 1:26:09 PM, richard.nantel@videotron.cawrites: Richard - I think you may have misunderstood what people were saying.Nofinish on a rod would be a disaster. It would allow the cane to easilyexchange moisture with the air, and in the typical temperate zoneclimatewhere most of us live, you would have a big humidity spike in thesummer, anda drying effect in the heated indoor air of winter. No finish will stopthemoisture exchange, but any reasonable one will slow the processenough toeliminate the seasonal spikes and give you a moisture contentreasonablyclose to the average for your climate. The good news for Danny is thatmoisture is not fatal, and if he puts the rod in a drying cabinet, he isbackin business. I suspect his basement is the culprit. My own rods arealwaysstored in a heated space in winter, and air conditioned in summer.To give you an idea of how much moisture can be reabsorbed and thendrivenoff, I once straightened flamed strips by the Bokstrom soaking method.Thestrips became so pliable, I believe I could have tied them in a knot. Amonthlater I glued up the rod, never having done anything special to dry thestrips. The rod is an ultra crisp caster, that has never taken a set.Another thought for Danny. If your basement is indeed dry, you may nothaveenough heat treatment into the strips. If that is the case, even areasonablemoisture content may be enough to allow the rod to take a set. I wouldstillbuild the rod. A couple of my early rods are probably in that category,butstill fish well from jlintvet@erols.com Tue Mar 14 17:49:16 2000 ([207.172.55.79] helo=compaq) Subject: Re: W